factual

Offsetting Differs for Animals vs Climate

There is a non-consequentialist asymmetry between dietary and climate offsetting: buying a factory-farmed chicken while donating to a corporate campaign harms different chickens, so one cannot offset harm to one individual with benefit to another; but a lifetime of carbon emissions paired with sufficient donations to climate charities reduces the total CO2 in the atmosphere over one's life, leaving no individual harmed in expectation.

factualpending

Speaker

Will MacAskill

Evidence Quote

it's not like i'm trading a harm to one person for the benefit to another but these are quite these are quite subtle issues when we get onto these kind of non-consequentialist reasons

Source

228 - Doing GoodMaking Sense with Sam Harris
Created: 6/14/2026, 2:36:45 AM

My Notes

Loading notes...