factual
Offsetting Differs for Animals vs Climate
There is a non-consequentialist asymmetry between dietary and climate offsetting: buying a factory-farmed chicken while donating to a corporate campaign harms different chickens, so one cannot offset harm to one individual with benefit to another; but a lifetime of carbon emissions paired with sufficient donations to climate charities reduces the total CO2 in the atmosphere over one's life, leaving no individual harmed in expectation.
factualpending
Speaker
Will MacAskillEvidence Quote
“it's not like i'm trading a harm to one person for the benefit to another but these are quite these are quite subtle issues when we get onto these kind of non-consequentialist reasons”
Created: 6/14/2026, 2:36:45 AM
My Notes
Loading notes...