The existential risk movement lacks peer-reviewed literature supporting its claims and shows no effort to produce it; there is also no signal in market prices supporting AI existential risk concerns, suggesting the movement is not credible by the two best epistemic sources (peer review and markets).

factualpending

Speaker

Tyler Cowan

Evidence Quote

there is no peer-reviewed literature supporting what they say... there's nothing and I do mean nothing in market prices to support this fear [28:06]

Source

AI’s New World Order: US-China, War, Job Loss | Tyler CowenJohnathan Bi
Created: 8/11/2026, 8:00:09 AM

My Notes

Loading notes...