Byzantine-resilient consensus protocols based on cellular automata are fundamentally superior to classical quorum-based protocols because they don't require knowing exact network membership, tolerate Byzantine adversaries larger than a majority in some cases, scale to millions of nodes rather than hundreds, and degrade gracefully rather than having sharp security thresholds

factualpending

Speaker

Emin Gün Sirer

Evidence Quote

classical protocols... do not degrade gracefully they degrade the moment the attacker is bigger than 33 percent... in contrast in avalanche and similar networks what there is is there is a parameterized security component

Source

Distributed Consensus with Cellular Automata & Related Systems Research ConferenceWolfram
Created: 8/10/2026, 11:10:13 PM

My Notes

Loading notes...