The defendant's explanation about kicking an officer is preposterous and on video, and she has lied to officers multiple times in recorded conversations, yet no objective person believes her explanations.

factualpending

Speaker

Judge

Evidence Quote

your explanation about what happened is preposterous it's on video you have no problem lying to officers it's happened multiple times they're record recorded conversations it's just more lies no objective person believes them

Source

'You're a charlatan': Judge sentences defiant Tina Peters to 9 years | Full videoDenver7
Created: 8/13/2026, 7:48:26 AM

My Notes

Loading notes...