When Nagel claims we can never know what it is like to be a bat, he is not adding new philosophical content but merely stating the trivial fact that we are not bats and therefore cannot have the bat's perspective; the apparent mystery is a linguistic trick created by the word 'know' that creates the illusion of a metaphysical barrier where none exists.

causalpending

Speaker

Murray Shanahan

Evidence Quote

So when so when Nagel says we can never know really know what it's like to be a bat, all he's saying is that we are not bats and we can never we can never be bats, right?

Source

Human vs. Machine Consciousness | Imperial’s Murray ShanahanJohnathan Bi
Created: 8/11/2026, 6:51:36 AM

My Notes

Loading notes...