causal
Adds-up constraint forces top-down consistency
Because the distributional accounts must add up to total National Income, claims that bottom incomes grew a lot are logically constrained: if the bottom grew more, the top must have grown much less than estimated, which is contradicted by overwhelming evidence on top incomes—so the adding-up discipline is what gives the method its bite.
causalpending
Speaker
Gabriel ZucmanEvidence Quote
“if you believe that income has grown a lot at the bottom of the distribution, it has to be the case that it has grown a lot less at the top of the distribution than what we estimate”
Created: 6/13/2026, 12:26:44 AM
My Notes
Loading notes...