Anil Seth
About
Neuroscientist who writes on emergence
Cast within
No topic-region cast yet — this appears once Anil Seth's compiled claims are aligned into a topic region's argument tree.
Claims by Anil Seth (20 of 159)
We should not invoke new fundamental principles of physics as explanation for consciousness because materialism—the view that consciousness is a property of matter suitably arranged—has rich resources that have not been exhausted, and matter is far more complicated than is typically understood.
The 'real problem' of consciousness (contrasted with the hard problem) focuses on explaining the nature of specific experiences (why vision differs from emotion, why we have a sense of free will) rather than just what people report or do; progress is being made on this real problem through neuroscience and comparative study of different conscious experiences.
The brain operates as a prediction machine: it constantly makes predictions about the causes of sensory signals and updates these predictions based on sensory input; all conscious experience (perception of world, self, free will, emotion) is a form of controlled hallucination grounded in prediction and physiological regulation of the body.
My Notes
Loading notes...