Dan Carlin
About
Podcaster, host of Hardcore History
Cast within
No topic-region cast yet — this appears once Dan Carlin's compiled claims are aligned into a topic region's argument tree.
Claims by Dan Carlin (20 of 164)
It is essentially impossible to imagine a credible presidential candidate in 2028 running on a platform of curtailing presidential power, despite this being what the country structurally needs, because such a position is counterintuitive to the ambitions of someone seeking maximum power
American problems result from a combination of systemic factors and the people—the American population is fundamentally different from 40 years ago, and the same systemic problems would not succeed against populations with different values, suggesting both structural and cultural decay.
The political system is structurally incentivized to preserve and expand presidential power because there is significant financial benefit to dividing Americans through partisan politics, making it rational for candidates not to voluntarily constrain presidential power even if doing so would benefit the country
As it becomes harder to distinguish real from artificial content and as computer-generated content proliferates, humans will increasingly seek authenticity, potentially driving a cultural pendulum swing toward live performance, unexpected elements, and human improvisation that cannot be artificially generated
In the 1990s when Carlin began his Common Sense podcast, there was no political constituency that aligned with his centrist, anti-establishment position, but he accidentally caught a wave in the cultural zeitgeist where it briefly seemed like a new generation was emerging that shared his worldview, before that movement collapsed and the situation deteriorated further
The founding documents of the United States, particularly the Federalist Papers, demonstrate that the founders, many of whom were in their early 20s, were deeply concerned with the fundamental problem of constraining executive power and preventing presidential tyranny through constitutional design
Arthur Schlesinger's 1970s book 'The Imperial Presidency' identified the Nixonian presidency as having accumulated excessive executive power, and was considered by the public at that time as a cautionary warning from which future presidents would learn, but in reality the presidency's powers have become infinitely stronger in the 40 years since than they were when Schlesinger warned about imperial overreach
Executive orders and signing statements have historically existed but were used differently than they are now—George W. Bush inaugurated the practice of using signing statements to preemptively exempt himself from congressional legislation he disagreed with by claiming it interfered with presidential powers
Trump's constellation of constitutionally extreme actions is not technically unprecedented because each individual extreme action was taken by some previous president, but Trump is the first president to combine and execute all of these extreme actions simultaneously, creating a cumulative effect beyond what any individual president achieved
My Notes
Loading notes...