Jonah van Borg
About
Commodities and crypto trader; global head of crypto and precious metals trading at DRW; partner at Vitol (world's largest oil trading company); crude oil derivatives trader at Goldman Sachs; credit default swaps trader at Lehman Brothers during 2008 financial crisis
Cast within
No topic-region cast yet — this appears once Jonah van Borg's compiled claims are aligned into a topic region's argument tree.
Claims by Jonah van Borg (20 of 42)
Jonah van Borg started his career at Lehman Brothers during the financial crisis, worked as a credit default swaps trader, then moved to Barclays post-bankruptcy, then to Goldman Sachs trading oil derivatives, then to Vitol as a partner for almost 7 years, then to DRW for 2 years as head of crypto and precious metals trading
Regulatory hostility toward crypto trading is not rational or justified from a systemic risk perspective, but reflects political bias; commodities trading receives no comparable scrutiny despite similar leverage and counterparty risk, making crypto a uniquely risky professional career path
The Federal Reserve pivot from 'higher for longer' to imminent rate cuts (despite inflation only recently coming down) is irresponsible because it continues monetary accommodation without addressing underlying over-leverage and over-employment, mortgaging younger generations' futures to realize Net Present Value gains accumulated by Baby Boomers over the last 15 years
The optimal personal strategy in an environment of rate cuts and persistent fiscal stimulus is to borrow at floating rates (not fixed) and deploy that leverage into real assets—real estate, Bitcoin, S&P 500—because nominal asset prices will rise as the dollar weakens and the capital structure re-leverages
Commodity market volatility creates alpha opportunities for traders because the investment community stigmatizes commodity returns (viewing them as zero-drift asset classes that don't always go up), leaving profit opportunities on the table for disciplined traders who can time cycles and trade both long and short sides
Bitcoin ETFs will drive billions of dollars in institutional inflows not through a single euphoric spike on day one, but through steady dollar-cost averaging by financial advisors managing private wealth, who rationally spread allocations over weeks or months to avoid concentration risk and reputational damage if they buy at a peak
Bitcoin is so compelling as a long-term investment that he moved from professional crypto trading to personal buy-and-hold, replacing his work position with personal capital after the FTX collapse, allowing him to capture upside without managing active risk in the now-hostile regulatory environment for crypto
Larry Fink will not build a proprietary 'Blackrock chain' because BlackRock already has its own private ledger system (Aladdin) for internal operations; if Fink pursues public tokenization, it will be as an L2 or application chain built on top of Ethereum or Solana, leveraging existing validator infrastructure rather than building new custody/validation
Most altcoin and L1 projects outside Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana have terrible UX, lack genuine user adoption (beyond speculation), and don't represent meaningful innovations over existing off-chain systems; they should be treated as high-risk option plays, not core investments, and should only be considered if there's a plausible case for real system adoption
Tokenization of securities (via crypto infrastructure) solves real friction in existing financial systems by enabling t-plus-0 or t-plus-10-second settlement instead of t-plus-2 business days, which in a high-interest-rate environment means trillions of dollars are unnecessarily locked up and not generating yield
Tokenization enables the creation of niche commodity markets (e.g., Agbami crude oil specific to Nigerian refineries) that are too small to list on major exchanges, but can now be spun up cheaply on decentralized networks, allowing producers to directly access consumers without intermediation
My Notes
Loading notes...