Unidentified Speaker — How global trade killed the liberal world order | Business … [ptZs1l-RCq8]
Extraction couldn't determine who this speaker is in How global trade killed the liberal world order | Business Beyond. If you recognize them, use "Identify this speaker" above to merge their claims onto the real person.
About
Speaker whose identity could not be determined from "How global trade killed the liberal world order | Business Beyond".
Cast within
No topic-region cast yet — this appears once Unidentified Speaker — How global trade killed the liberal world order | Business … [ptZs1l-RCq8]'s compiled claims are aligned into a topic region's argument tree.
Claims by Unidentified Speaker — How global trade killed the liberal world order | Business … [ptZs1l-RCq8] (20 of 47)
The Atlantic Charter signed in August 1941 by Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill outlined four core principles for the post-WWII world: no country should seek territory beyond its borders, democracy should prevail, nations should trade freely, and hostile countries should disarm.
The multilateral institutions created after WWII—the World Bank, IMF, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, later WTO), and the European Coal and Steel Community—represented two distinct poles: the American democratic West and Soviet-led autocracies, creating a bipolar political and military world.
The expectation that free trade would lead to democracy has not materialized in China—since Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, term limits have been abolished, Xi's thoughts have been enshrined in the constitution, state surveillance has increased, and descent has been repressed, all during rapid economic development.
Because the IMF, World Bank, and WTO were effectively American-led, the dollar emerged as the world's dominant currency, giving the US two major advantages: the ability to borrow money more cheaply than other countries, and the power to impose financial sanctions and play a policing role on the world stage.
In 2001, China joined the WTO. A year earlier, US President Bill Clinton gave an address saying the agreement was a one-way street requiring China to open its markets while the US maintained present access, and that by joining the WTO China would agree to import democracy's most cherished value—economic freedom—which would lead Chinese people to demand greater political say.
My Notes
Loading notes...