
286‒Journal club with Andrew Huberman: light exposure on mental health & an immunotherapy for cancer
What this covers
View show notes here: https://bit.ly/3tTNsT0 Become a member & receive exclusive content: https://peterattiamd.com/subscribe/ Sign up to receive Peter's newsletter: https://peterattiamd.com/newsletter/
Andrew Huberman returns for another special journal club episode. He introduces an observational study investigating the influence of light exposure on circadian clock regulation & its link to mental health, while Peter covers a phase III clinical trial employing immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic cancer. They delve into the essential findings of their respective papers, elucidate the reasons for their enthusiasm, & tackle potential limitations & unanswered questions. Additionally, they provide valuable insights into their approaches for comprehending research studies, aiding listeners in independently navigating this process.
We discuss: 0:00:00 0:00:11-Relationship between light exposure, circadian rhythms, & mental health 0:09:13-Importance of low solar angle sunlight 0:15:25-Lightbulb technology that simulates low solar angle sunlight 0:17:51-Significance of darkness & the need for direct light exposure to the eyes 0:20:22-Tips regarding optimizing light exposure & effects on circadian rhythm 0:23:57-Andrew presents a paper which suggests avoiding light at night & seeking light during the day is associated with better mental health 0:33:31-Negative impact of increasing nighttime light exposure & the positive effects of daytime light exposure 0:46:18-Statistical analysis: the importance of focusing not only on statistical significance but also clinical relevance, power analysis, error bar range, & more 0:50:45-Takeaways from the study of daytime & nighttime light exposure 0:56:53-The practicalities of minimizing light exposure & screen time at night, sleep trackers, & challenge of modern, indoor lifestyles 1:08:30-Potential limitations of the light exposure study, reverse causality, & the complex interplay of variables in epidemiological studies 1:16:29-A tangent on diet soda & sugar substitutes as an example of reverse causality 1:21:23-Opinions on the causality vs. correlation of light exposure to mental health, the damage of circadian disruption, & the interpretation of observational data 1:29:59-Primer on the immune system 1:41:46-Background on cancer: causes, how it evades the immune system, & the logic behind immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy 1:57:45-Peter presents a paper on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cancer patients 2:08:14-Unpacking the results of the checkpoint inhibitor trial 2:25:51-Noteworthy observations, including the differing results between males & females 2:30:35-Adverse effects from treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting CTLA-4 2:36:48-Why melanoma is especially responsive to immunotherapy, & the remarkable success story of immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer 2:48:18-Why immunotherapy may be the most important hope we have for treating cancer 2:52:00-Avoiding melanoma: sunscreen, sunburn risk factor -------- About: The Peter Attia Drive is a deep-dive podcast focusing on maximizing longevity, & all that goes into that from physical to cognitive to emotional health. With over 70 million episodes downloaded, it features topics including exercise, nutritional biochemistry, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, mental health, & much more.
Peter Attia is the founder of Early Medical, a medical practice that applies the principles of Medicine 3.0 to patients with the goal of lengthening their lifespan & simultaneously improving their healthspan.
Learn more: https://peterattiamd.com
Connect with Peter on: Facebook: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDFB Twitter: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDTW Instagram: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDIG
Subscribe to The Drive: Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveApplePodcasts Overcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveOvercast Spotify: http://bit.ly/TheDriveSpotify Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/TheDriveGoogle
Disclaimer: This podcast is for general informational purposes only & does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services, including the giving of medical advice. No doctor-patient relationship is formed. The use of this information & the materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content on this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical condition they have, & they should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such conditions. I take conflicts of interest very seriously. For all of my disclosures & the companies I invest in or advise, please visit my website where I keep an up-to-date & active list of such companies. For a full list of our registered & unregistered trademarks, trade names, & service marks, please review our Terms of Use: https://peterattiamd.com/terms-of-use/
Source description (no synthesized summary yet).
Light exposure timing—morning and evening sunlight combined with nighttime darkness—functions as an independent, powerful lever for mental health outcomes, separate from and additive to sleep duration, and checkpoint immunotherapy represents the most promising avenue for cancer treatment by unleashing the immune system's natural tumor-recognition capacity.
- Daytime light exposure and nighttime dark exposure show dose-dependent, independent associations with reduced psychiatric symptoms across depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, PTSD, and psychosis in 86,000 UK Biobank participants
- Checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CTLA-4) achieve 31-36% risk reduction in all-cause mortality for metastatic melanoma by blocking immune brakes, extending median survival 4 months and enabling long-term survival in previously terminal cases
- Light's effect operates through intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells detecting wavelength contrast at dawn/dusk, signaling circadian rhythm and mood centers in the brain, making it perhaps the most fundamental environmental stimulus for mental health
This asset isn't compiled yet
You're seeing its claims, ranked. Compile it to build the argument threads, weight them, and check each claim against your library — the full view.
A famous study from Chuck Czeisler's lab at Harvard Medical School that claimed light exposure behind the knee could shift circadian rhythms was retracted, and only light exposure to the eyes (not skin or other body parts) is relevant for circadian rhythm regulation and mood effects
“there wasn't a study that was in error where they had published in Science magazine that light shown behind the knee could shift circadian rhythms and that paper was retracted um and a lot of people don't know that it was retracted light exposure to the eyes is what's relevant here”
Historic experiments by David Bours at Brown showed that when bright light is shown on intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, the neurons ramp up their membrane potential and fire long trains of action potentials lasting hours, indicating sustained signaling downstream into the brain and body
“the experiments of recording from these cells first done by David burs and at Brown were you know historic in the field of visual Neuroscience when shown bro bright light on these intrinsically photosensitive cells you could crank up the intensity of the light and the neurons would ramp up their membrane potential and then start spiking firing action potential long trains of action potentials that have been shown to go on for hours”
The photon-summing circadian system is perhaps the most evolutionarily conserved mechanism in cellular organisms, present from single-cell organisms through humans, dogs, and rabbits, suggesting fundamental importance to survival and functioning across all complex life.
“this mechanism is perhaps the most well-conserved mechanism in cellular organisms so there and I'll use that as a way to frame up the four types of light that one needs to see every 24 hours for Optimal Health”
Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (melanopsin retinal ganglion cells) are located in the neural retina and respond to two different types of light input, sending information to the hypothalamus where the master circadian clock resides, which then sends secretory signals (peptides, hormones, neural signals) to the brain and body to regulate wake-sleep cycles
“there's a set of cells in the neural retina which aligns the back of your eye they're sometimes called intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells they're sometimes called melanopsin retinol gangan cells... it's well known that those cells are the ones that respond to two different types of light input not one but two different types of light input and send information to the hypothalamus where your master circadian clock resides and then your master circadian clock sends out secretory signals so peptides hormones but also neural signals to the brain and body”
Morning sunlight phase-advances the circadian clock (like pushing a child on a swing closer to the body to shorten the period), making one want to go to bed earlier and wake up earlier, while evening sunlight phase-delays the clock (like pushing from behind to extend the period), making one want to stay up later and wake up later, and these two signals average to keep the clock stable
“when you look at morning sunlight you're advancing your circadian clock translate to English or non- nerd speak you're making it such that you will want to go to bed a little bit earlier and wake up a little bit earlier the next day in the evening when you view low solar angle sunlight so in the a the afternoon Setting Sun or evening Setting Sun you do the exact opposite you're phas delaying the clock... these two signals average so that your clock stays stable You Don't Drift”
Midday sunlight provides over 100,000 Lux on a bright clear day at noon, while most indoor environments including brightly-lit department stores provide only 4,000-6,000 Lux maximum
“if you're out in the sun with no cloud cover or minimal cloud cover in the middle of the day at noon chances are it's over a 100,000 luck on a really bright day could be 300,000 Lux okay most indoor environments even though they might seem very bright I like to think of your your kind of like uh department store with the bright lights believe it or not that's probably only closer to 6,000 Lux maximum and probably more like 4,000 Lux”
Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) correlates with day length such that many people report better mood and fewer depressive symptoms during longer spring and summer days, and conversely report lower mood when days are shorter in fall and winter
“there is such a thing as Seasonal effective disorder it doesn't just impact people living at really Northern locations but basically there's a correlation between day length and mood and mental health such that for many people not all but for many people when days are longer in the spring and summer they feel better they report fewer depressive symptoms and conversely when days are shorter significantly more people report feeling lower mood”
ICU (intensive care unit) psychosis occurs when non-psychotic individuals develop psychotic episodes while hospitalized due to hospital lighting environments (particularly dreadful lighting) combined with inability to control sleep-wake cycles from medical procedures, and these psychotic symptoms resolve when patients return home despite ongoing treatment for the primary condition.
“there's a well-known phenomenon called ICU psychosis which is that people come into the hospital for a broken leg or a car accident maybe they were getting surgery from from Peter back when for something totally independent they're they're housed in the hospital and as anyone who's ever been in a hospital as a patient or visitor knows the light in the lighting environment of the hospital is absolutely dreadful for health just Dreadful... people often complain about the food in the cafeteria being un healthy that's often not always true not always true but the lighting environments in hospitals is absolutely counter especially especially in the Intensive Care Unit... people who who go into the hospital with with a brain injury or or with a stroke or something I get contacted all the time even though I'm not a clinician what should I do for my kid my parent my I always say get them near a window and start to the best of your abilities controlling their sleep wake cycle”
The human immune system evolved to accomplish the extremely difficult task of detecting any foreign pathogen billions of years into the future without knowing what it will be, while simultaneously being forgiving enough of self-antigens not to attack the body's own cells—a remarkable evolutionary balance.
“the human immune system is kind of a remarkable thing... it it's hard when you're sort of trying to imagine what's the most amazing part of the human system... it is remarkable to me how our immune systems evolved and they have this really brutal task which is how can they be tuned to detect any foreign pathogen that is harmful without knowing a priority what that could be while at the same so in other words how can you tune a system to be so aggressive that it can eradicate any virus or bacteria billions of years into the future without knowing what it's going to be but at the same time it has to be so forgiving of the self that it doesn't turn around and attack the self”
Female patients showed weaker responses to anti-CTLA-4 than males in this study and in approximately half of other anti-CTLA-4 trials, with possible mechanisms being sex-specific immune response differences or dose-by-weight differences (men heavier, receiving higher absolute doses).
“notice that in females while there's a trend towards risk reduction... the females did not reach significance... I found that about half the studies of antict 4 did indeed find that the drug was less effective in women than men which I found interesting now I couldn't find any great explanation for it but the most plausible explanations fit into two categories the first are maybe there are differences in the immune response to the drug if you're a man or a woman the second uh comes down to dosing... these drugs are not like a pill where it's like everybody gets you know 50 milligrams of this they're all dosed based on weight so this study is dosed I believe at 3 milligrams per kilogram and because most men are heavier than women men are getting a higher dose than women”
Overpowering a study (enrolling far more subjects than required by power analysis) can be problematic because it increases probability of reaching statistical significance for effects that may not be clinically meaningful, making a slightly larger sample than necessary preferable.
“there's a belief that bigger is always better in sample size and we often talk about that through the lens of power analysis right so how many subjects do we need to um to to reach a conclusion that is powered to you know this level and that's that's true but what I don't think gets discussed as often is the opposite of that which is what if you overpower power a study in other words what if the power analysis says to be uh to have a level of power at 90% you need a th subjects and you Sayre we're going to do 10,000 subjects well you're clearly powered for it but you might be overpowered and people might say well why would that be a bad thing it could be a bad thing because it means you are very likely to reach statistical significance in things that might not be actually significant”
The middle of the day and middle of the night are both 'circadian dead zones' where light cannot shift circadian phase, but light in the middle of the night can still provide wakefulness signals to body and brain even though it won't phase-shift the clock.
“you know we've hammered on people about not shifting their circadian rhythm with light at night but we know that the middle of the day and the middle of the night are circadian dead zones you can't shift your circadian rhythm that well in the middle of the day in the middle of the night but you can provide a wakeup signal for for your body and brain it's really that sunrise and sunset that are critical”
The Stanford sleep lab has shown that waking in the middle of the night to check the time is powerfully disruptive to sleep quality through psychological effects (time checking creates distress about insufficient sleep), independent of light exposure per se.
“we know based on studies from the Stanford sleep lab that if you wake up in the middle of the night looking at what time it is can be very disruptive to your ability to fall back asleep and to your sense the next day it's just a placebo effect but it's a powerful one of how tired you are the next day they've done this where they wake people up in the middle of the night and then they say it's you know 4:00 A.M versus 2: a.m. versus 6 a.m. and people's perceived levels of energy during the day in some ways correlate with what they think how much sleep they think they got”
PTSD symptoms and self-harm show dramatic increases with high nighttime light exposure (Q4 quartile), whereas generalized anxiety shows less impressive relationships, suggesting differential vulnerabilities of psychiatric conditions to light exposure timing.
“the symptomology of PTSD gets far worse with increasing light exposure at night self harm really takes a a leap from being fairly I don't want to say minimal at the second and third quartile so low and let's say medium I'm using some I'm taking some Liberties here but low and medium amounts of of artificial light exposure at night then for people who get quite a lot of nighttime light exposure self harm goes up... anxiety relatively the you know less impressive here and and bipolar disorder didn't seem as strong”
Cancer is a genetic disease in the sense that every cancer has mutations, but most cancer mutations are somatic (acquired during life in specific cells) rather than germline (inherited), so 'cancer is genetic' does not mean 'cancer is inherited.'
“we know that again you know cancer is a genetic disease in the sense that every cancer has genetic mutations um most of those mutations are sematic which means most of those mutations are mutations that occur during the course of our life they're not germline mutations the germline being the uh eggs and sperm right so it's all other cells”
Approximately 20% of treatment-group patients were still alive at 56 months (tail of Kaplan-Meier curve), whereas essentially all placebo-group patients were dead by 44 months, suggesting durable responses in minority of patients.
“people in the placebo group They're All Dead except that one y they're basically all dead at 44 months yep but when I look at the number how long it takes for everyone to be dead in the TR treatment groups it's like 50 looks like 5503 54 months or so well and they're and they're not dead that's the point they're hanging in there right so because you know an extra somebody who um lost both of my uh scientific advisers two of the three the the other one to Suicide... the other uh two to different cancers... an extra 8 to 10 months with your kids or with your spouse or to quote unquote get your Affairs in order is is a big deal”
Median survival for metastatic melanoma increased from 6.4 months (placebo GP100) to 10-10.1 months (anti-CTLA-4 ± GP100), representing approximately 4-month absolute survival extension.
“50% of the patients in the control group were dead in six months 50% of the patients in the treatment group both treatment groups were dead in 10 months so what that means in cancer speak is these drugs extended median Survival by four months... the 10 months was for the anti-la 4 plus GP 100 and 6.4 months for the gp00 alone that's the control and then 10.1 for the ntla 4 alone”
The paper "Day and night light exposure are associated with psychiatric disorders" published in Nature Mental Health examined more than 85,000 UK Biobank participants and used wrist-worn accelerometers with ambient light sensors to measure both daytime and nighttime light exposure
“this paper um which was published in a new Journal I'm really excited about called nature mental health this journal was just launched recently um is entitled day and night light exposure are associated with psychiatric disorders and objective light study and more than 85,000 people”
Approximately 80% of solid organ tumors have antigens that are recognized by the host immune system as foreign, yet these cancers still progress, suggesting the problem is not lack of immune recognition but insufficient T-cell numbers or activity to mount an effective response.
“at least 80% of solid organ tumors and we're going to mostly talk about solid organ tumors because that's where the field of oncology has made very little progress... more than 80% of those cancers have antigens that are recognized by the host's immune system I will state it again because it is so profound 80% at least of those cancers actually generate an antigen meaning a little peptide in that cell gets presented to the T cell and it is recognizable and now the question is why is that not sufficient to induce remission and the short answer is there are not enough te- cells that are able to act and or they are being sufficiently inhibited from acting”
Melanoma historically has more mutations than most solid tumors, making it particularly immunogenic and explaining why early immunotherapy successes (IL-2) and checkpoint inhibitor trials were conducted in melanoma.
“most cancers probably have about 40 mutations in them that's like ballpark 4050 mutations is standard fair for a cancer but melanoma happens to be one of the cancers that has many many more mutations and the more mutations a cancer has the more likelihood that it will produce an antigen that's recognized as non-self and that's why in the early days of immunotherapy the only things that worked were I to against metastatic melanoma and kidney cancer because kidney cancer turned out to also be one of those cancers that for reasons that are not clear produced hundreds of mutations”
Checkpoint inhibitors represent a fundamentally different therapeutic approach than previous cancer immunotherapy: rather than trying to amplify immune response (IL-2 strategy, ~10% response rate), checkpoint inhibitors block inhibitory signals to unleash existing T-cell response.
“and a thought experiment emerged which was what if we block ctla4 what if we block the checkpoint could we unleash the immune system a little bit more and I will say this at the time it was proposed it seemed a bit far-fetched um because of the complexity of the immune system it seemed a little far-fetched that simply blocking the checkpoint would have any effect... prior to this one immunotherapy had found some efficacy which was trying the exact opposite strategy rather than blocking the inhibitor it was throwing more accelerant at the fire which was giving something called interlukin 2”
ECOG performance status 0 (no limitations despite imminent death) and ECOG 1 (some limitations) represented 98% of patients, suggesting that despite 6-month survival expectations, most patients were functionally healthy at enrollment—a sobering testament to cancer's trajectory.
“it kind of amazing when you really consider something I think this speaks to just how devastating this disease is um these are patients who all have like 6 months to live right you know a year Max and yet look at this 58 to 60% of them have no limitation on their quality of life at this very moment that's going to change dramatically”
Virtually all study participants reported some adverse event (96-98%), but only 6-8.4% reported grade 4 (life-threatening) toxicity, similar to placebo rates (~6%), suggesting adverse events partially reflect disease progression rather than pure drug toxicity.
“in the uh treatment plus GP 100 group 98.4% of people reported some event so all but 1.6% in the ntla 4 group alone it was 96.7% so only 3.1% did not but in the placebo group it's 97% so it's important to keep in mind like you know everybody's having some adverse effect okay well let's just limit it to the most severe events well let's just talk about grade four toxicities there were 6.1% of those in the placebo group 8.4% in the anti C4 group and 6.8% in the combined group so not a huge difference in grade four toxicity”
Cancer is evolutionarily clever in that it employs multiple immune evasion strategies: secreting immunosuppressive factors (IL-10, TGF-beta), creating an acidic microenvironment through lactate production that further suppresses immune cells, and other mechanisms that collectively prevent immune activation.
“it basically does a lot of things to trick the immune system so it has its own secretory factors that Tamp down the immune system it grows in an environment because of its nature... it's heavily glycolytic and when something is heavily glycolytic it's going glucose to pyruvate to lactate nonstop there are lots of reasons for that... it's super interesting... glycolysis lowers the surrounding pH because of lactate lactate attracts hydrogen pH goes down and guess what that does to the immune system detracts the immune system so it's also a way to hide from the immune system”
Light from windows that does not directly show the sun does not trigger the circadian photosensitive mechanism effectively, but skylights and light directly visible through windows are more effective because the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells reside mainly in the bottom 2/3 of the neural retina and look upward with low resolution
“unless the light is coming directly through the window most of the relevant wavelengths are filtered out in other words if you can't see the sun through the window even if sufficient light is being provided that's insufficient to trigger this phenomenon... windows on your roof which some people do skylights that makes the situation much much better in fact the neurons that in the eye that signal to the circadian clock and these mood centers in the brain reside mainly in the bottom 2third of the neural retina and are responsible for looking up”
The sky at sunrise and sunset is enriched with blue-orange or blue-red color contrast (not midday which is white light), and these color-opponent cells compare blue to orange/red wavelengths, with the subtraction between them triggering the signal for cells to fire to the circadian clock, making sunrise and sunset the times when this wavelength contrast is most potent
“there are two times of day when the sky is enriched with Blues oranges pinks and reds and that's low solar angle sunlight at Sunrise and in the evening these cells are uniquely available to trigger the existence of those wavelengths of light early in the day and in the evening not in the middle of the day so these cells have these two cone photo pigments and they say how much blue light is there how much red light is there or orange light and the subtraction between those two triggers the signal for them to fire this signal off to the circadian clock”
Light is perhaps the most fundamental environmental stimulus for levels of arousal and alertness, which correlate with all sorts of neuromodulator and hormone outputs, making it more foundational than most people recognize.
“I personally am very sensitive to sunlight in the sense that if I don't get enough sunlight I don't feel well after a couple of days um but I'm less sensitive to light exposure at night for instance but I think it is perhaps this is a big statement but is perhaps the most fundamental environmental stimulus for levels of arousal and alertness which correlate with all sorts of you know neuromodulator and hormone outputs”
The study originally planned to measure response rates as primary endpoint but changed to overall survival (OS) during the study, which required regulatory approval but is clinically more meaningful than response rates.
“the primary outcome for this study actually changed in the study now they have to get permission to do that um but the so the original primary endpoint was the best overall response rate... however uh oh I think I said I think it's... but the amendment was made to change the primary endpoint to overall survival”
Sleep trackers and wearable recovery scores are notoriously poor at predicting actual performance, and serious athletes rely on more traditional metrics like morning resting heart rate, heart rate variability, and workout-specific measures rather than recovery scores.
“recovery scores and things like that are just notoriously poor at predicting performance and I think there's a reason that serious athletes would never use things like that um they would tend to rely on the more tried and true methods of predicting Behavior such as heart rate uh maybe heart rate variability but morning resting heart rate probably more predictive than anything else”
People who deliberately get dark exposure at night (absence of light) actually benefit for mental health outcomes even if they aren't getting enough sunlight during the day, and dark exposure acts independently from daytime light in improving psychiatric outcomes
“turns out that dark exposure at night independent of light exposure during the day is important for mental health outcomes now most people think dark exposure how do I think about that well it is dark absence of light it's the absence of light but what this paper really drives home is that people who make it a point to get dark exposure at night aka the absence of light at night actually benefit even if they're not getting enough sunlight during the day”
While blue-light filtering technology has become prevalent (flux on computers, blue-blockers, screen filters), the context of use matters more than the spectral content—what you're doing on the device (social media doom-scrolling vs. entertainment) affects sleep/mood more than whether light is blue-shifted.
“I suspect that that matters somewhat but I think what matters more is the stimulation that may come from those things and what I've come to realize at least in me which means it probably is true in others as well and at least some others is that what I'm doing on my phone matters more than how bright my phone is in other words if I've got the best blue light filter in the world on my phone but I'm doom scrolling social media and getting lit up on email that's way worse for me than if I've got my phone on maximum light and I'm like watching YouTube videos of F1 cars and driving around having fun”
Overall survival is the 'most important metric' in cancer trials but is 'the highest bar' that drugs rarely meet because it represents absolute cure requirement rather than just life extension.
“overall survival is the most important metric and it's the highest bar make no mistake about it and it's certainly not the bar any drug company is ever going to want to talk about for a cancer drug but why not because because they don't none of them work right like we don't have you know like drug they only want to talk about cures they don't want to talk they only want to talk about media and survival they want they only want to talk about extending media and survival”
Some antidepressants may suppress the ability for daytime light to positively impact mood, and while people should not halt medication based on this, understanding which medications affect circadian light sensitivity could inform treatment decisions.
“conversely there's evidence that people who take certain anti-depressants May suppress the ability for daytime light to positively impact the mood systems of the brain now of course we don't want people halting their medication on the basis of that statement alone please don't you know talk to your psychiatrist but if we know one thing for sure it's that if you want a significant outcome and a paper as a scientist give a drug any drug and look at the amount of rapid eye movement sleep or the Circadian cycle pretty much any drug alter Arcadian Rhythm for better or worse”
Afternoon and evening sunlight exposure can partially offset the negative effects of artificial light exposure at night by reducing the amount of melatonin suppression from nighttime light by approximately half
“if you do see afternoon and evening sunlight there's a beautiful study published in science science reports yes science reports two years ago showing that that can partially offset the negative effects of artificial light exposure at night I think of this as your Netflix inoculation and the amount of melatonin suppression from Nighttime light exposure is haved by viewing evening Setting Sun”
Oncology drugs extending median survival by 4-9 weeks or 9 days while costing $40,000-$100,000+ are approved and marketed, illustrating industry incentive to focus on median rather than overall survival.
“there are you know lots of people out there that are on this on this platform I don't need to get on to it but who will say like look it's a real racket in in oncology today where drugs that are extending median Survival by four weeks are being put on the market at a tune of you know $50 to $100,000 per treatment that's not uncommon in oncology uh there was one drug that was approved for pancreatic cancer I believe it extended median Survival by nine days and it cost $40,000 and it's being adverti as significant extend that was a statistical significant Improvement in media and survival”
The recommended light exposure protocol for optimal health involves viewing low solar angle sunlight (sunrise or sunset) in the early part of the day for 10 minutes or so, and another 10 minutes minimum of low solar angle light in later part of day, plus as much sunlight in the eyes as safely possible throughout the day, while minimizing light exposure at night
“I suggest on non cloudy days we'll call them that people get 10 minutes or so of sunlight in their eyes in the early part of the day another 10 minimum in the later part of the day as much sunlight in their eyes as they safely can throughout the day”
In winter months, experiencing darkness upon leaving a clinic or indoor space in the afternoon creates an 'eerie feeling' that may reflect the brain attempting to orient itself in time, and this disorientation is especially problematic for children and correlates with mood disturbance.
“especially in the winter months it's important to look West and try and get some sunlight in your eyes in the evening if you've ever gone into the clinic for instance at 2 o'clock in the afternoon after lunch you know and then in the winter and then come out and it's dark when you're walk into your car it's a kind of eerie feeling that sort of eerie feeling May correlate with the fact that you missed a signal your your brain is trying to orient your brain and body in time”
A phone on maximum light intensity without any filtering produces approximately 500-1000 lux at viewing distance, and cumulative photon exposure is additive over time (lux × duration), so extended phone use at night can deliver substantial circadian-disrupting photon exposure.
“what is your phone if you don't use any sort of uh light mitigating uh Tech on it well distance matters um at the distance we're holding it yeah with so with all the the wavelengths cranked up so no uh there is a nice feature intrinsic to the phone where you can eliminate the blues at night or you know this kind of thing but if you crank it up to maximum light intensity probably something like you know 500 to ,000 Lux now keep in mind though it's additive right so it's over time so Lux is a measure of I think I think it relates back to Candelas it's the amount of light um shown at I think it's like the one meter away and there's a squaring and a falling off of distance we can look it up um these are old measure old school measurements converted to Lux but keep in mind that if you're looking at your phone or tablet at 800 Lux or 500 Lux in the evening and you do that for 2 hours well you're summon quite a lot of photons”
Future cancer immunotherapy advances likely involve engineering T-cells to better recognize antigens, expanding tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and enhancing them, or modifying T-cells to tolerate acidic pH and other tumor microenvironment challenges.
“the Holy Grail is the meaning the next step if you go back to where we start of the discussion is coming up with ways to engineer te- cells to be even better recognizers of antigens and there's many ways to do that one is to direct engineer them another is to find tea cells that have already migrated into tumors those are called tumor infiltrating lymphocytes or till and expanding those and Engineering them to be better and younger”
The health of the immune system is one of the most interesting open questions in longevity, and modulating immunity appropriately as people age may be more important than many current interventions, with rapamycin potentially being one approach to enhance cellular immunity in aging.
“how do you modulate immunity um as you age and to me that's one of the most interesting things about rap ay potentially is that when taken the right way it seems to enhance um cellular immunity which again that that's potentially a really big deal again at least in in short-term human experiments in response to vaccination it's enhancing vaccine response so the question is would that translate into cancer nobody knows could that be one of the reasons why animals treated with rap ayin live longer and get less cancer don't know”
Complete darkness at night (pitch black) probably increases frequency of nighttime injuries from bathroom trips and other necessary nighttime activities, so some dim lighting at night is appropriate despite the paper's recommendations for darkness.
“you don't need Pitch Black in fact pitch black probably just increases the frequency of injury you know I get up in the middle of the night to use the bathroom probably once I think it's normal I go back to sleep you know if it were pitch black I'd probably injure myself so just just dim it down”
A friend with Lynch syndrome developed pancreatic cancer (unresectable) and enrolled in a kit truda (anti-PD1) checkpoint inhibitor trial targeting Lynch syndrome patients who have mismatch-repair mutations and high tumor mutational burden.
“friend of mine got pancreatic cancer and he got um the bad type of pancreatic cancer so this is uh and like the um um adnoc carcinom in the pancreas right so this this is a a non-survivable type of cancer furthermore his was unresectable... so I was going to ask this question later but I'll just ask it now when it comes down to when someone has Lynch syndrome there's one of those few hereditary or germline mutations that results in a huge increase in the risk of cancer he had already had colon cancer at about the age of 40 um and had survived that it was a stage three cancer but he had survived it well now 5 years later had developed uh panc creatic cancer and when he went to see the surgeon um they said yeah we there's nothing we can do like it's too advanced so that's you know to put that in perspective that is a death sentence... there was a study that had come out in the New England Journal of Medicine that had talked about how patients with Lynch syndrome had lots of mutations and so we you know talked with his doctors about the possibility of enrolling him in one of the kit truda trials”
Wearing blue-blocking glasses in the middle of the day is counterproductive and among the worst things one can do for circadian and mood health, whereas wearing blue blockers at night is more defensible, and the priority should be dimming overhead lights at night rather than obsessing about blue light wavelength
“some people are putting blue blockers on in the middle of the day which is the worst thing you could possibly do if you're going to wear blue blockers and I don't think they're necessary but if you're going to wear them you'd want to wear them at night and in the evening you don't need to wear blue blockers you just simply should dim the lights and ideally have lights that are set a little bit lower in your environment”
Red light bulbs or red-light environments in evenings/nighttime are preferable to blue-rich lighting and can support natural circadian patterns without requiring expensive technology.
“some people use red lights you know our friend Rick Ruben friend yeah Rick ruin is uh can we tell a funny story about Rick... he removed all the lighting that existed in that room and replaced it with red light bulbs... in his place he has mostly either no lighting or red lighting so during the day he just goes by ambient light um and then red light in the evening and or candle light”
The Hopkins ICU at the main facility lacked windows, creating particularly poor light environment for patients with brain injury or stroke, and people with head injuries are frequently contacted asking for advice on improving lighting, with recommendation being to place patients near windows.
“I think the the Intensive Care Unit at Hopkins the main one the the main siku didn't have Windows people who who go into the hospital with with a brain injury or or with a stroke or something I get contacted all the time even though I'm not a clinician what should I do for my kid my parent my I always say get them near a window”
Some individuals are more resilient to light effects on mood and circadian rhythm than others—meaning some people can stay up late, get bright light at night, or wear sunglasses all day and maintain good mood and stable sleep, while others are highly sensitive, with genetic polymorphisms potentially underlying this variability
“some people seem more resilient to these light effects than others meaning some people you know also don't suffer from jet lag too much some people can stay up late get a lot of bright light exposure in the middle of the night and during the day they got their sunglasses on all day and they're in a great mood all the time other people are more susceptible these sorts of things and we don't know whether or not gen polymorphisms underly that”
Wrist-worn light sensors have directional limitations because they don't measure light specifically at the eye level, but this limitation can be reconceptualized as an advantage because it better captures ambient light exposure during activities (e.g., conversing under an overhang) rather than only direct sun viewing.
“they had it on the outside of the sleeve but they asked that people just keep it on their dominant hand it's not perfect but in some ways it's kind of nice that it's not perfect we could turn that disadvantage into an advantage by thinking you know when the person is out and about they're not often looking right at the sun you know if you're talking to a colleague under an overhang for instance so it's it's not perfect directionally it's directionally right”
A major question unanswered by this paper is whether there is correlation between autoimmunity incidence/severity and treatment response, given prior evidence that autoimmune reactions predict checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.
“the last thing I'll say about this paper that I found interesting and I I was looking for it and I was surprised they didn't at all comment on if there was any correlation between autoimmunity and response rate um so they obviously acknowledge the autoimmunity in in table three but I would have loved to have seen a statistical analysis that said hey is there any correlation between response rate and autoimmunity but um they they didn't comment to that effect”
Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy is the most promising therapeutic approach for solid tumors to date, offering potential for durable responses in minority of patients and conceptual foundation for future developments despite current modest overall survival gains.
“in summary I'll say that the reason I thought this was an interesting paper to present is that I still believe that immunotherapy is probably the most important hope we have for treating cancer and well I think we're still only scratching the surface of it so collectively the overall survival increase for patients with metastatic solid organ tumors is about 8% better than it was 50 years ago and virtually all of that has come from some form of immunotherapy um I think is promising and I think the Holy Grail is the meaning the next step”
While autoimmune organ destruction is severe, survival of checkpoint inhibitor-induced Type 1 diabetes (insulin-dependent) is acceptable tradeoff compared to certain death from metastatic pancreatic cancer.
“so now he is effectively had a pancreatectomy based on his immune system so now he actually has Type 1 diabetes he has no pancreas he injects insulin to deal with that or no no he has to insulin just like some type di you had to pick being alive with type one diabetes yeah of course no comparison but it's just an interesting example of how you know remarkable this treatment was able to work when you could completely unleash the immune system of a person and you eradicate the cancer and the rest of the cells around it”
People are currently spending approximately 90% of their time indoors during daytime, and most indoor environments are too dim to trigger adequate circadian and mood effects even when lights appear bright, creating a widespread light deprivation problem.
“people are spending approximately 90% of their time indoors nowadays daytime time indoors and those indoor environments are simply not bright enough you think oh there's all these bright lights and some people are putting blue blockers on in the middle of the day which is the worst thing you could possibly do”
The paper's title 'Day and night light exposure are associated with psychiatric disorders' is poorly worded and sounds concerning at first reading, but the actual conclusion is that getting lots of daytime sunlight and nighttime darkness is beneficial for psychiatric health—the title could mislead readers into thinking light exposure causes psychiatric problems.
“I have to say that I think the title of this paper is terrible sorry folks at nature mental health because if one just read the title it sounds like day and night light exposure associated with psychiatric disorders right right if this were If This Were a newspaper headline You'd be like oh my goodness well what are you supposed to do right but that's not the conclusion the conclusion is that getting a lot of sunlight exposure during the day and getting a lot of dark exposure at night is immensely beneficial for psychiatric health”
MHC class 1 presents endogenous antigens (proteins made inside the cell, e.g., viral proteins during infection) to CD8 T-cells, whereas MHC class 2 presents exogenous antigens (from outside the cell) to CD4 T-cells, creating two parallel immune pathways.
“class one is what we call endogenous so this is basically what happens when a protein or an antigen is coming from inside the cell... the other example is MHC Class 2 and that's also part of the Adaptive system or the innate system which uh is more what we call the um exogenous form so these are peptides that are usually coming from outside the cell so we're going to focus more on the MHC class one because this is peptides that come from inside the cell”
The thymus is large in childhood where it educates T-cells to recognize self and eliminate any T-cells that don't recognize self (thymic selection), then involutes (shrinks) in adulthood after its function is largely complete.
“you and I have a no good for nothing tiny little thymus that would be it's almost impossible to see these things you know when you used to operate on people you know the thymus is barely visible in an adult in a healthy adult outside of thymic tumors but as a CH in a child the thymus is quite large and the purpose of the thymus is to educate te- cells and basically show the te- cells what self is and any te- cell that doesn't immediately recognize it gets killed so it's it's a really clever system where we basically teach you to recognize self at a very early age and if you can't do that you're weeded out and then the thymus involutes thereafter”
Complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all cancer lesions; partial response (PR) is ≥50% reduction in diameter of all lesions with no new lesions appearing and no existing lesions growing.
“a complete response is the easier of these to understand a complete response is everything vanishes completely that's very rare in cancer therapy so instead what we kind of look for is a partial response a partial response... is at least a 50% reduction by diameter... a partial response is at least a 50% reduction at least of every single lesion with no new lesions appearing and no lesions growing”
An antigen is a small peptide (typically 9-20 amino acids) that the immune system can recognize as foreign or self, remarkably allowing the body to distinguish self from non-self based on tiny molecular differences in amino acid sequences.
“we have something called uh an antigen so an antigen is an antibody generating peptide so it's a it's a it's a protein almost always a protein they can be carbohydrates but they're almost always proteins and they're very very small peptides like we're talking as little as nine amino acids maybe up to 20 amino acids so teeny tiny little peptides but it's amazing that in such a short peptide the body can recognize if that's Andrew or not Andrew”
An odds ratio is the probability of something happening in one group divided by the probability of it happening in another group, and an odds ratio of 1.78 means there is a 78% increased chance of the outcome in the affected group (calculated as: odds ratio minus one equals percent increase).
“what they're looking at is what they call the odds ratio which is the probability of something happening in one group vers divided by the probability of something happening another group... if you took the odds ratio of um you know death so let's talk all cause mortality for a smoker versus a nonsmoker and the answer were 1.78 I'm making that up but that's directionally correct 1.78 as an odds ratio means there's a 78% chance greater of the outcome of interest in this case death by any cause in the affected Group which would be the smokers so odds ratio of two is 100% And Odds ratio of three is 200% so the math is take the number subtract one and that's the percent”
The study ran three statistical models: Model 1 (unadjusted association), Model 2 (adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, photo period), and Model 3 (adjusted for employment status, physical activity, shift work), and results were similar across all three models suggesting independent effects of light exposure.
“they ran three models and you can tell me what you think about the power of these models but you know as somebody who thinks about the mechanistic aspect of all of this a lot but not somebody who's ever run this type of study I'd be really curious model one examined the unadjusted association between day and nighttime light exposure and psychiatric outcome... model two adjusted for the age of the person their sex and ethnicity and photo period... and then model three adjusted for employment so employed versus unemployed which if you think about it is pretty important... they Incorporated information about employed versus unemployed physical activity which turns out to be very important and then like shift work”
The paper studied anti-CTLA-4 drug (Ipilimumab) using 3:1:1 randomization with three arms: (1) GP100 placebo vaccine, (2) anti-CTLA-4 alone, (3) anti-CTLA-4 + GP100, enrolling ~700 patients total with more participants in treatment arms than control (80% vs. 20% chance of treatment).
“so the the drug we're going to talk about today is an anti-la 4 drug called um iolab... this study um sought to compare the effect of antict 4 to a placebo and the placebo in this case was not a real Placebo it was a peptide vaccine called GP 100... the study was a 3: one: one randomization so again in the simplest form a study would have two groups right you would have um we're going to just have a treatment group and a placebo group but in this arm you had three groups with one of them being the placebo the placebo got just GP 100... you had the antict 4 group and then you had antict 4 plus GP 100”
Study participants were patients with metastatic melanoma who had progressed through all standard therapies (chemotherapy, radiation), including ~25% who had failed high-dose IL-2 therapy and had no remaining treatment options.
“these are all patients who um had progressed through every standard therapy so these are patients for whom there were no other options um these patients either had very Advanced stage three melanoma which means it was local Regional melanoma... and they'd already been through the standard chemotherapy and nothing was working and the thing was growing and then it was mostly made up of patients with stage four cancer... these patients many of whom had already taken and progressed through interlukin 2 Let me refresh my memory on what percentage of those patients about a quarter of these patients had already taken high does interlukin 2 and by definition the fact that they're in this study means they had already progressed through that that treatment had failed”
Cancer cells have two hallmark properties that distinguish them from normal cells: (1) they do not respond to cell-cycle signaling telling them to stop growing (unlike normal cells which stop growing at appropriate times), and (2) they have capacity to metastasize (leave origin site and establish tumors elsewhere).
“Cancers behave differently from non-cancer in two very critical ways the first way is that they do not respond to cellcycle signaling so if you cut your skin it heals but how does it know to heal just right and not to keep growing and growing and growing and growing and growing well it knows that because there are cycle signals that tell it time to grow time to stop... cancer loses that ability that is one of the Hallmarks of cancer it just keeps growing doesn't grow faster by the way that's a misnomer people think cancers grow faster than non-cancer there's no real evidence that that's the case they just don't stop growing the second property of cancer is the capacity to leave the site of origin go someplace else and take up residence so that's metastasis”
Bright light therapy using lamps exceeding 10,000 Lux has proven fairly effective for treatment of seasonal affective disorder when placed on kitchen counter, at table, or in office in the morning
“there's a long-standing treatment for Seasonal effective disorder which is to give people exposure to very bright light especially in the morning the way that that's normally accomplished is with these sad lamps Seasonal effective disorder lamps and those lamps are basically bright meaning more than 10,000 Lux lights”
The Warburg effect (high glycolysis in cancer cells despite functioning mitochondria) originally proposed to result from defective mitochondria but now understood as an adaptation for generating building blocks for cell division and creating immunosuppressive acidic microenvironment.
“that's the effect what I just described is called the warberg effect and when warberg proposed this uh which God was probably in the 1920s it was before World War I before World War II um he proposed it be he thought the mitochondria of cancer cells were defective so he proposed that the you know cancer cells mitochondria don't work hence they have to undergo glycolysis they can't undergo uh aerobic um uh metabolism um we now know that that's not the case so we now know that the the the warberg effect... almost assuredly does not have to do with defective mitochondria others have proposed several mechanisms I think there's probably more than one thing going on”
GP100 was chosen as placebo because it had never shown efficacy previously (tested with IL-2 and as adjuvant), but had been studied as cancer vaccine target due to being consistently expressed by melanoma cells in study participants.
“the placebo got just GP 100 which is just a cancer vaccine by the way this is a cancer vaccine that never showed any efficacy so it was a cancer vaccine that had been tested both with interlukin 2 directly and um as an adant for patients who had metastatic melanoma or had sorry not metastatic melanoma who had melanoma reected who were tumor free and then given the vaccine as adant to see did that have an effect on outcomes and it didn't so it's kind of a known Placebo”