The Great Reset: The Most Dangerous Idea Of The 21st Century?
What this covers
See My Portfolio & Where Opportunity Is In The Market (Discount): https://theinvestingacademy.teachable.com/p/theinvestingacademy?coupon_code=SALE&product_id=4455382
Is the great reset the most dangerous idea in the world today, or is it something that will benefit future generations? Let's dig deeper!
📜Get 2 FREE STOCKS With WeBull: http://bit.ly/WeBullStock
📈 How To Invest Course: http://bit.ly/theinvestingacademy-how-to-invest-in-the-stock-market
📊 Sven Carlins (Expert Investor) Portfolio & Free Course: http://bit.ly/SvenCarlinPortfolio
2020 we saw something that had never been done in the history of the world. Each country went into lockdown, no travel, businesses closed, isolation, people couldn’t work, it was unprecedented to give the government this much power. Now because of this situation, the world economic forum and other influential groups are putting forth the idea of something called the great reset.
The great reset is the idea of changing the way the economy works, & changing capitalism to make it in their words “more sustainable”. The question is, with the great reset, are they going to be making the economy better, or is there something under the surface. A hidden agenda so to speak. There’s theories going around that this great reset is simply a way of bringing a new world order. We’re going to be covering all of this in the video, let’s dig deeper guys!...
The first thing that we need to uncover is who’s bringing forth this idea of the great reset. The main people behind it, is a group called the world economic forum. The WEF. The WEF, they’re basically like a society. Now this society is formed of a group of basically quite wealthy people. It costs between 52,000 and 530,000 pounds to join.
And they come together once every year in Davos Switzerland to discuss global issues, economic concerns and other important topics. At this meeting they also invite business moguls, international political leaders, economists, celebrities and journalists to join in on these discussions.
Recently they came up with this idea called the great reset. They then got influencers like Prince Charles to support the idea. But, what exactly is this great reset all about? What exactly do they want to do? Let’s go to their website and see what they say…
Under context they start off with “The Covid-19 crisis, and the political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making. The inconsistencies, inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems –from health and financial to energy and education – are more exposed than ever amidst a global context of concern for lives, livelihoods and the planet. Leaders find themselves at a historic crossroads, managing short-term pressures against medium- and long-term uncertainties”.
They say that the opportunity is “As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons. Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities, the Great Reset initiative has a set of dimensions to build a new social contract that honour’s the dignity of every human being”.
Now there’s one glaring problem with the great reset idea proposed by the world economic forum. The problem is that they haven’t given us anything set in stone of what they want to do.
They haven’t said we want to make 100,000 more electric cars to prevent pollution. Or, plant 10 million new trees to help the environment. No, there’s nothing clear about what they want to do, they just said we want to help change national economies, make things more sustainable, and help businesses benefit everyone.
Subscribe Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6qBTYqQpXqLutg39ZgXcJQ?sub_confirmation=1
___ AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: Some of the links on this webpage are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, we may earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. However, this does not impact our opinions and comparisons ___ DISCLAIMER: It's important to note that I am not a financial adviser and you should do your own research when picking stocks to invest in. These are just some of my viewpoints, by no means would I recommend watching one YouTube video and then immediately buying that stock. This video was made for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your financial adviser.
Source description (no synthesized summary yet).
The Great Reset proposed by the World Economic Forum lacks concrete implementation details and raises concerns about centralized control by wealthy elites, with ambiguous intentions that could mask a hidden agenda to consolidate power under the guise of addressing global problems.
- WEF has released vague aspirations (sustainability, equality, public good) without specific actionable plans or measurable targets
- The top-down structure of the initiative—wealthy elites determining solutions for global problems—mirrors the power consolidation that characterizes tyranny
- Better solutions will emerge from democratic, bottom-up approaches by ordinary people rather than centralized directives from the world's richest institutions
This asset isn't compiled yet
You're seeing its claims, ranked. Compile it to build the argument threads, weight them, and check each claim against your library — the full view.
In 2020, every country went into lockdown simultaneously for the first time in history, which was unprecedented in terms of the governmental power granted to authorities over citizens' movements, work, and isolation.
“2020 we saw something that had never been done in the history of the world each country went into lockdown no travel businesses closed isolation people couldn't work it was unprecedented to give the government this much power”
The World Economic Forum and other influential groups are using the crisis and the unprecedented government power it created as an opportunity to propose the Great Reset, which aims to fundamentally restructure capitalism to be more 'sustainable' according to their definition.
“now because of this situation the world economic forum and other influential groups are putting forth the idea of something called the great reset the great reset is the idea of changing the way the economy works and changing capitalism to make it in their words more sustainable”
Based on available information from the WEF, the key stated priorities of the Great Reset are: (1) addressing environmental sustainability and pollution, (2) reducing economic inequality through wealth taxes and fossil fuel subsidy withdrawal, and (3) advancing public health and social welfare through coordinated institutional effort.
“these are the key issues that they want to solve one is obviously sustainability the economy as we know it produces a lot of pollution we've got factories pumping smoke into the air cars doing the same thing we've seen increased wildfires and we've seen global sea levels rise this great reset wants to help prevent some of these sustainability slash environmental issues that we've seen”
The World Economic Forum is a society formed by wealthy individuals with membership costs between £52,000 and £530,000, whose members meet annually in Davos, Switzerland to discuss global economic and social issues, and they also invite business moguls, political leaders, economists, celebrities, and journalists to participate.
“the main people behind it is a group called the world economic forum the wef the wef they're basically like a society now this society is formed of a group of quite wealthy people it costs between 52 and 530 000 pounds to join and they come together once every year in dubbo switzerland to discuss global issues economic concerns and other important topics at this meeting they also invite business moguls international political leaders economists celebrities and journalists to join in on these discussions”
The WEF's stated rationale for the Great Reset centers on the idea that the 2020 crisis has created a unique window of opportunity to reshape global relations, national economies, corporate models, and global governance, framed as building a 'new social contract that honors the dignity of every human being.'
“under context they start off with the crisis and the political economic and social disruptions it has caused is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision making the inconsistencies inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems from health and financial to energy and education are more exposed than ever amidst a global context of concern for lives livelihoods and the planets”
Prince Charles and other influential figures have publicly endorsed the Great Reset idea promoted by the WEF.
“they then got influences like prince charles to support the idea”
The WEF has identified a broad list of 20+ specific domain areas it aims to reshape, including economic recovery, social contracts, skills and jobs, environmental restoration, business models, taxation, gender parity, human rights, circular economy, climate change, biodiversity, aviation, tourism, banking, capital markets, and ocean management.
“what i did manage to find was a graph on their website of the main areas that they want to change slash reimagine so you got shaping the economic recovery redesigning social contracts skills and jobs restoring the health of the environments developing sustainable business models in the areas relating to taxation lgbti inclusion gender parity human rights circular economy air pollution future of foods geopolitics climate change biodiversity aviation travel and tourism banking and capital markets the ocean”
A major critical weakness of the Great Reset as presented by the WEF is the absence of concrete, specific implementation plans—the initiative has released only vague aspirations without measurable targets, specific projects, or clear methodologies for achieving its stated goals.
“there's one glaring problem with the great reset idea proposed by the world economic forum the problem is that they haven't given us anything set in stone of what they want to do they haven't said we want to make a hundred thousand more electric cars to prevent pollution or plant 10 million new trees to help the environment no there's nothing clear about what they want to do they just said we want to help change national economies make things more sustainable and help businesses benefit everyone at the moment at least from the information that they've released to the public there's no direct plan on the way they want to change things”
The question of whether the Great Reset represents good-faith reform or power consolidation hinges on whether it emerges from democratic, bottom-up processes (legitimate) or is imposed top-down by an unelected elite claiming to deliver 'the promised land' (tyranny).
“the question we must ask is who is the power who is looking for the control if it's the people if it's democratic then that's fine but if it's a top-down approach saying we're gonna deliver you the promised land with milk and honey then i'd be concerned”
The fundamental problem with vague, top-down initiatives like the Great Reset is that tyranny begins with the desire to coerce others under the justification of 'the greater good,' making the concentration of power in unelected hands the central threat regardless of stated intentions.
“there's theories going around that this great reset is simply a way of bringing in a new world order we're going to be covering all of this in the video let's dig deeper guys the first thing that we need to uncover it reminds me of a quote that i read recently or tyranny begins with the desire to coerce others for the greater good they're saying yeah we want sustainability more equality this is for the greater good but the question we must ask is who is the power who is looking for the control if it's the people if it's democratic then that's fine but if it's a top-down approach saying we're gonna deliver you the promised land with milk and honey then i'd be concerned”
Skeptics worry that the Great Reset may mask a hidden agenda to consolidate elite power under the guise of addressing global problems, potentially using vague language about 'public good' to obscure authoritarian intent or the elimination of property rights and individual economic freedom.
“however there are a growing amount of people who think there is a hidden agenda behind this idea of the great reset maybe their intentions aren't as nice as they make it sound people are worried that this may be a ploy of the elite to bring in a so-called new world order”
While many of the Great Reset's stated goals are positive (environmental restoration, equality, human rights), the fundamental credibility problem is whether the richest individuals on Earth—who benefit from and control existing systems—can be trusted to fairly and effectively solve the problems those systems created.
“as you can see a lot of these intentions are actually good things some of course are a bit questionable do we really need these but the majority of them are positive the question becomes is the world economic forum the richest of the rich is prince charles going to be the people who address and solve these problems you want to solve equality while you're the richest of the rich maybe give away some of your money you want to help the environment while you own the big corporations maybe stop polluting the planet so much”
The speaker cannot determine with certainty whether the WEF's intentions are genuinely benevolent or represent a power grab, but acknowledges both possibilities: some urge to do good combined with personal power-seeking motives ('power games, who is going to be viewed as the hero').
“at the end of the day if i'm honest i can't tell directly what their intentions are i think some of it is the urge to do good and address some of the world's problems but also some of it is power games who is going to have control who is going to be viewed as the hero”
Institutions like capitalism, despite their flaws, have evolved to solve critical problems and have delivered unprecedented material abundance—living standards equivalent to 'being kings in the 21st century'—which means reform must be approached carefully to preserve what works rather than carelessly destroying functioning systems.
“capitalism yes it does have its flaws but it's done so much for us and our society we're all basically living like 21st century kings with food on demand travel anywhere with cars and planes the ability to message our loved ones across the world and yes it's got its problems you don't have to be a genius to work that out but looking to make it better rather than worse is a tricky problem indeed”
Jordan Peterson's first rule from his book is: 'Do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievements.' He argues that although problems and potential solutions are unlimited, there are comparatively few solutions that actually work practically, psychologically, and socially, making thoughtless criticism of institutions dangerous.
“the way the great reset is used to help solve capitalism it reminds me of jordan peterson his first rule in his new book do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievements he says although there are an unlimited amount of problems as well as an unlimited amount of potential solutions there are comparatively limited amounts of solutions that actually work practically psychologically and socially it is the reality of this natural ethic that makes thoughtless denigration of social institutions both wrong and dangerous institutions have evolved to solve problems that must be solved for life to continue they are by no means perfect but making them better rather than worse is a tricky problem indeed”
Solutions to complex societal problems will come from decentralized, bottom-up action by ordinary people rather than from centralized directives issued by powerful elites, regardless of the elites' stated benevolence.
“my personal belief is the solution will come from the people not the powerful asking for a great reset”
There are theories circulating that the Great Reset is a vehicle for establishing a new world order, a concern that gained significant traction—including a Canadian petition against it that garnered 80,000 signatures in less than 72 hours.
“there's theories going around that this great reset is simply a way of bringing in a new world order we're going to be covering all of this in the video”