
Jim Grant (Interest Rate Cycles, Are Today's Events Unprecedented? Price Signals, Economic History)
What this covers
Check out the next Rebel Capitalist Live at https://www.rebelcapitalistlive.com
For more content that'll help you build wealth and thrive in a world of out of control central banks and big governments check out the videos below! 👇
🔴 Subscribe for more free YouTube tips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpvyOqtEc86X8w8_Se0t4-w
Do you wanna see another video as incredible as this?
Watch "Jeff Booth (Private Sector Vs Government Money Printing, Sound Money, Civil Unrest, Totalitarianism)": https://youtu.be/cgatlkw02kc
Watch "Mike Maloney (The Great Reset End Game, Inflation, Deflation, US Dollar, Bitcoin, Gold)": https://youtu.be/c7Ph2xStWNc
Watch "Peter Schiff (Election Impact On Markets, Media Attack, CBDC's, Cash Ban, Personal Freedom)": https://youtu.be/dkl9m4Kwkno
Watch "Lyn Alden/Jeff Snider (QE, Deflation, Inflation, Dollar, Eurodollar System, Future US Economy)": https://youtu.be/B4xcCO9v-Os
Watch "Luke Gromen (Dollar Hegemony Fading, Economic Collapse, MMT, And Social Unrest!!)": https://youtu.be/C5Ahqp-J1Cw
Watch "Brent Johnson (Is Dollar Milkshake Still Valid? Swap Lines, TGA, US Inflation, & Much More!)": https://youtu.be/Qtdcw-NzMVE
Watch "Jim Rogers Reveals Secrets That Could Make YOU RICH! (RCS Ep. 44!)": https://youtu.be/9U8Chc1EMyY
Watch "Danielle DiMartino Booth Reveals Incredible Insights For 2020! RCS Ep. 52": https://youtu.be/cOX69bB4vJY
Stay tuned every week for new content!
#EndTheFed #Risk #Markets
Source description (no synthesized summary yet).
Jim Grant argues that suppressed interest rates distort price discovery across all markets, creating financial instability through malinvestment and speculation, and that this represents an unprecedented monetary regime with few historical parallels.
- Interest rates are the fundamental price signal in markets; manipulating them eliminates discipline and incentivizes excessive risk-taking
- The current 'PhD standard' of central bank management has created zero-gravity financial conditions where valuations become detached from fundamentals
- Historical precedent (1940s-1951 yield curve control, 1920-21 depression, late 1800s deflation) shows that both suppressed rates and high rates followed by adjustment produce boom-bust cycles, but current regime combines both simultaneously
This asset isn't compiled yet
You're seeing its claims, ranked. Compile it to build the argument threads, weight them, and check each claim against your library — the full view.
Pension funds and other institutional investors with mandated actuarial return targets are forced to 'reach for yield' when safe assets (10-year Treasury below 2%) offer insufficient returns, pushing them into junk bonds, emerging market debt, and other risky assets, thereby funding unsustainable borrowers and setting up future financial crises.
“pension funds and everyone needing a you know a certain [10:58] rate of interest with which to satisfy actuarial demands it's you know looking around for things to do how do we do that when the 10-year treasury is yielding you know less than two percent well the junk bonds yielding uh two and a quarter you know or uh emerging russian debt that seemed promising until about two weeks ago”
Interest rates are the fundamental price signal in a market economy because they calibrate credit risk, discount future cash flows, measure the price of time, set investment hurdle rates, and act as traffic signals indicating whether to go fast or slow.
“interest rates um are the swiss army knives of uh of our finances you know you use them to uh to calibrate or measure credit risk you can tell how credit worthy or not a borrower is by the rate of interest that it pays interest rates discount future cash flows uh they are the price of time and someone once said they help us to set investment hurdle rates you can think of them as a traffic signals in a market economy you know they say go fast or slow”
The Fed has direct control over very short-term interest rates, less direct control (more influence) over 2-5 year rates, and much less direct control over 10-30 year rates; the Fed's main tool for longer rates is rhetorical control and expectations management (signaling what it will do), but it cannot directly control long-term rates.
“so enter the fed so the fed that now has control typically pretty good control over the very very short term there's less control over the two to five year period there's influence there from that direct control it has much it has a rhetorical control it tells you what to think when [21:47] you talk or it primes the market by setting expectations and so there's a little bit of a psychological game going on with longer days but it has no has very little direct control over 30 years okay except for setting expectations of its own policy”
Walter Bagehot, a 19th-century monetary authority, observed that central banks should lend freely but at a high rate of interest against good collateral during crises, yet modern central bankers have largely abandoned the 'high rate' and 'good collateral' principles.
“one of my uh biographical subjects named walter badgett who was a guy in the middle of the 19th century and he was a fan of monetary muse of the gold standard error he was he was credited or blamed for the doctrine that central banks at a time of crisis ought to uh to lend freely but he also said to lend it a high rate of interest and against good collateral yeah our central bankers today especially recall the the idea of lending feeling the rest of it they kind of forget”
William McChesney Martin (Fed Chair around 1955) emphasized that the purchasing power lost to inflation is never regained, warning that even temporary high inflation has permanent effects on living standards because prices don't return to previous levels.
“well here here's here's a quotation from william mcchesney martin uh that's about 1955 i think which is a year by the way in which the cpi did actually register a small year-over-year decline but still martin the fed sherman then was worried about inflation he's always worried about inflation one of the great warriors about inflation and you said something was almost a direct one you said that don't forget he said the purchasing power once law the purchasing power of a dollar once lost to inflation was never regained”
One should never fall in love with any single asset—not bonds, stocks, land, or gold—because emotional attachment leads to overconcentration and poor decision-making, as exemplified by a banker who committed suicide after his gold stocks portfolio collapsed.
“you have to be careful you have to be careful you can't fall in love with anything you can't fall in love with bonds stocks land gold nothing love it for something else so gold is is again it's it's an essential thing to own or something it's a central part of one's portfolio because we live in a world of monetary fictions”
Paul Volcker's brutal monetary policy (very high interest rates to break inflation) in the mid-1970s and early 1980s is often compared to current policy, but Volcker's approach was necessary because the Fed had allowed inflation to spiral out of control in the prior decade (following the end of the gold standard in 1971).
“so paul volcker in the [19:09] about the mid-1970s of finance wasn't that the gold uh definition of the dollar ended in 1971 famously and the and during that inflation there came to be a visible lack of discipline and i've certainly seen this perhaps you have as well in the past ten dozen years all sorts of stuff has happened that wouldn't happen i think with a as you say with a five percent funds rate”
Money is not humanity's best subject—when large sums of money are involved, people naturally go crazy, losing sleep and self-control, which is a fundamental human behavioral tendency that exists independently of monetary regime.
“people i think i've often reflected that money is not humanity's best subject but around large sums of money people just go crazy which reminds me of the um to be the unintended humor of the idea of an efficient market”
Interest rates show long-cycle behavior spanning decades (1865-1900 falling, 1900-1920 rising, 1920-1946 falling, 1946-1981 rising, 1981-present falling for 41-42 years), and people become psychologically acclimated to the direction of the current cycle, developing the belief that rates are 'meant to' continue in that direction.
“uh you know since the u.s civil war uh from like 19 1865 1900 which fell from 1900 1920 or so it rose i think 2046 they fell and then they you know they're wrong sebastian 46 to 81 and they have fallen from the past 20 to 41 years so um in each of these cycles people became acclimated uh 20 even 20 years a long time to watch something and not develop the notion that it's meant to be for all”
The 1940s-1951 yield curve control regime was similar to today in that rates were kept very low and securities were being purchased, but it differed because at that time the dollar nominally had an anchor in gold (at $35 per ounce) and this anchor at least theoretically constrained monetary expansion even though it was largely suspended during wartime.
“between 1942 and 1951 uh the uh that instituted uh uh what we would now call it yield curve controls it uh it pegged that was the verb it pegged uh rates of interest along the curve short to long the bill rate was three-eighths of one percent the long bond was something like two and a quarter two and a half rates more or less where they are today the bill rate of course three-eighths one percent is towering over what we have seen the past ten years um but uh yeah so that but at that time there was at least nominally an anchor on the value of the dollar was defined as 1 35th of an ounce of gold”
The late 1800s (1865-1900) experienced persistent deflation of about 2-3 percent per year, yet nominal GDP, nominal wages, and per-capita GDP all increased, implying the standard of living improved substantially despite persistent deflation.
“i know that the date is hard to come by but from what i've seen you know we had a deflation of about maybe two percent three percent per year but nominal gdp actually went up so did nominal wages from what i can gather and even on a per capita gdp so if you just look at those headline numbers it would it would imply that the standard of living would have increased tremendously during that time frame”
During the late 1800s deflation, farmers suffered greatly because they experienced rising railroad freight rates while their crop prices fell, creating a vicious squeeze that forced many into debt and liquidation despite overall real wage growth.
“but on some people it uh it was it was uh very hard for farmers living from hand to mouth barely making subsistence income i felt keenly the nexus of rising railroad freight rates and stable or falling crop prices um but you know the uh uh it was a time of of wondrous technological innovation”
Efficient market hypothesis—the theory that markets perfectly discount expected future cash flows through perfect competition and perfect information dissemination—is theoretically elegant but describes markets poorly because people lose rationality when large sums of money are at stake.
“this reminds me of the um to be the unintended humor of the idea of an efficient market which is the um you know the pure and hygienic discounting of expected cash flows and there is the perfect competition and the perfect dissemination of information amongst all plaintiffs all these freaking different no that's not the way the world operates when you get around a potential big sum of money it's like falling on lover you go crazy”
The yield curve flattening occurring now (between 2-year and 10-year yields) is happening before the Fed has even begun raising rates, which is unprecedented and has never occurred before.
“what is happening now is that the difference between two-year yields and 10-year yields have been very narrow now that's not strictly the definition of a yield curve as i take it as an inflation signaling recession signaling or boom signaling phenomenon i think the better uh space of the year curve to examine is that between um the 30-day or 90-day bill rate and the income rate versus the 10-year treasury note so the teddy treasury note is now not quite two percent the 30 days that's a 30 90 day bill rate is much less less the yield curve is not close to being flat there but it is close to being flat two years to ten years and some people walk out two years ten years so what is different today well one thing is that the flattening from two to ten is taking place before the fed even starts its projected cycle of raising interest rates never before seen this is a very new thing”
Speculative booms occurred even during periods of strict gold standards (pure gold standard, interwar gold exchange standard, Bretton Woods 'fake gold standard'), meaning that artificially low interest rates are not the sole cause of speculation but definitely exacerbate and elongate booms and deepen the preconditions for serious busts.
“we can't we can't say that um artificially low interest rates are the total cause of the speculation that we see in the market today or the hysteria but it definitely contributes or exacerbates it does it does it and it uh what it also does is elongate these boom deepen the the uh the risk and the preconditions of a serious bust”
Federal debt going into WWI (~1 billion) increased roughly 20-fold by the end of the war (~20 billion), creating very high federal debt-to-GDP ratio, with significant private borrowing also facilitated by the wartime inflationary environment.
“well it was very high because federal debt was very high for gdp because the fast in world war one i think the elective says the federal government had like 1 billion going into the war but he had 20 billion coming out of it”
The 1946-1981 bond bear market (35 years of rising rates) followed from the 1942-1946 implementation of Keynesian doctrine through the Employment Act of 1946, which made the federal government responsible for maintaining high employment and economic stability, institutionalizing active monetary and fiscal management.
“the catalyst was the employment act of 1946 he signed legislation uh saying that the united states was uh responsible the government was responsible for uh a state of uh of high employment and uh and economic stability so that was the institution of keynesian doctrine into into federal law”
Prior to the 1930s, the inflation-deflation cycle showed a clear heartbeat pattern with prices rising and falling regularly, but after the 1930s, deflation largely disappeared and the pattern became predominantly inflationary, likely because of sticky wages from the introduction of minimum wage, welfare, and Social Security.
“i remember looking at a chart of the rate of inflation going back to probably the mid-1800s in the united states and you can see prior to the 1930s it's just like a heartbeat i mean it goes up and down and up and down you know inflation deflation inflation deflation inflation deflation it kind of ends up around zero or you know prices from 1800 to 1900 went down by 50 percent but you had a lot of bouts of inflation in there as well but once you get to the 1930s you pretty much have almost zero uh deflation a very very little you know a couple of little blips there in the 1940s and i think one during the gfc but i always thought that maybe that's because wages now are are so sticky because in the 1930s and correct me if i'm wrong they came out with the minimum wage they came out with welfare and social security so uh you know it's got more government aggregate demand if you will uh in when times are tough and then you've got a a floor on the price of wages therefore a business can't you know if the revenues go down instead of staying in business because wages going down now they just go bust so then that affects the supply side”
The Spanish flu of 1918-1920 was much more deadly than COVID-19, but official commentary and journalistic coverage downplayed it, and there was not the kind of universal hysteria seen with COVID.
“and with an inflation pandemic you know died down died down actually all too at the description of the uh uh the mortality uh this was was uh was brutal much worse than colbit um but you know you go back and look at uh at the covering the journalistic coverage and the official commentary on the pandemic it was played down [40:32] um there wasn't anything like the universal um uh hysteria yeah hysteria”
High corporate and government debt in today's economy means that even modest nominal increases in interest rate yields would put pressure on companies carrying debt, forcing them to cut costs, fire workers, reduce production, and sell assets in order to service that debt.
“there's a lot of there's a lot of leverage or debt in corporate america uh families are better financed than there were in 2006 and seven but corporations and the government itself leave the government itself aside for a second but there's a lot of debt in the corporate world a lot of private equity transactions that have entailed a whole lot of leverage leverage being a wall street term for encumbrance or debt so the question is as we look at interest rates now beginning to rise and the yield curve began to flatten by some measures and you say well what what does that mean well it might mean that the economy has so much debt that even a a measured or nominal rise in yields would put pressure on companies that home money and they would have to take steps to repay debt you know they'd have to fire people cut back production do things to hunker down and uh kind of cell division”
The current monetary regime, which Grant calls the 'PhD standard' (unbridled management of monetary affairs by former 10-year faculty members at leading universities), has never been seen before in its particular combination of raging inflation with zero percent federal funds rates and continuing quantitative easing.
“so-called quantitative easing qe is still going it's kind of winding down but in the face of a pretty severe inflation the fed has set its little tiny policy interest rate at nil and continues to buy securities with money that didn't exist before the fed tap keys on a computer pad to call those dollar bills into existence so in the monetary regime you know we called it here at grass a phd standard which is the more or less unbridled management of our monetary affairs by former 10-year faculty members at our leading universities it's um it's kind of a new thing”
John Bull (the symbol of Britain) cannot tolerate interest rates as low as two percent because such low rates incite speculation and cause harm through boom-bust cycles, as observed during Walter Bagehot's era and continuing today.
“you said uh you're alluding to the national symbol of britain he said that john bull can stand many things but he can't stand two percent meaning that a rate of interest as low as two percent would incite a lot of speculation and get a lot of people hurt because they would uh start uh you know buying the bonds of these emerging markets you know in south america and elsewhere”
Suppressed interest rates lead to wasted capital and malinvestment because people undertake projects for which there is no real demand, and while this waste has entertainment value and psychological reward, it has real-world economic consequences including white elephants and inefficient allocation of resources.
“when interest rates are are manipulated especially when they are suppressed and pressed down to uh kind of long level there's a lot of wasted uh capital or people undertake projects for which there you said no real demand a fanciful imagine one the imagination could run rampant in this world in science a moment ago was kind of level in zero gravity and there's a lot of waste a lot it's you know a lot of it's fun people have taken up speculation not just because they hope to have a sound and sensible early retirement because it's fun and lights dance and and uh you get a little splash of confetti on your robin hood account”
The 1920-1921 depression was the last governmentally unmediciated (uninterrupted by policy intervention) business cycle downturn in U.S. history, lasting only about 18 months with severe but relatively rapid adjustment.
“so there was there was no federal response beyond that and uh the depression was relatively short wide over over and done within 18 months but it was very severe the stock market was down uh basically saw it in half commodity prices down this half or more unemployment not then measured was must have been in the teens profits corporate profitabilities certainly plunged initially um but uh i it was the last as i put the last governmentally unmedicated business cycle downturn and so to date in our history”
The Great Depression of the 1930s did not actually end in the 1930s but persisted like a chronic low-level illness through the 1940s, with recovery only arriving with World War II and subsequent postwar expansion.
“and so you compare that with what happened in 1929 through 1946 others say i say that the depression did not end in the 1930s it it persisted like a low-level chronic virus you know you can't get out of bed in the morning without really wanting to”
When Herbert Hoover convened leading industrialists to Washington in spring 1930 in response to a worsening business cycle, he explicitly instructed them to maintain wages above all else, a policy intended to prevent a repeat of 1920-21 but which actually prolonged the depression by preventing wage-price adjustment.
“the first thing that hoover herbert hoover did when confronted with um a business cycle downturn that was not going to be as mild as some thought it would be in the spring of 1930 he called all the industrialists leading industrials to washington and said that um that he was not prepared to lead this country to uh repeat episode of 19 2021 it fell so disastrously and this time he said to these people including henry ford and other than that caliber let us maintain wages above all things”
Cathy Wood's investment strategy of concentrating in high-growth, disruptive technology companies is not unique to the current era but has parallels in past boom periods (railroad booms of 1800s, canal booms, interwar speculation, Bretton Woods era speculation), though suppressed rates certainly amplify and extend such trends.
“kathy woods i think there have been kathy woods's during the pure gold standard during the interwar fake gold standard called the gold exchange standard there were kathy woods's during the bretton woods twilight fake gold standard and there is the real kathy was during our phd study yes so we can't we can't say that um artificially low interest rates are the total cause”
The depression of 1920-1921 was caused by the monetary inflation that financed World War I, followed by a sharp credit contraction and writeoff of investment errors through very high nominal and real interest rates, not by the Spanish Flu pandemic.
“the depression of 1920 was a began in the aftermath of uh america's participation in world war one and it was a consequence i believe of the economic policies that uh uh with which we fought world war one so it's a huge inflation the federal reserve just got into business in 1914 1915 and uh so it got right down to work with uh facilitating the uh monetization of debt and expanding the money supply to finance the inflation that was part and parcel of almost every war yeah world war one so the country emerged from this war uh with the pandemic and with an inflation pandemic you know died down died down actually all too at the description of the uh mortality uh this was was uh was brutal much worse than colbit um but you know you go back and look at uh at the covering the journalistic coverage and the official commentary on the pandemic it was played down um there wasn't anything like the universal um uh hysteria yeah hysteria uh so i don't i don't think that i the shortened my i don't think the spanish flu was responsible for the depression”
Because the Federal Reserve has suppressed interest rates through quantitative easing and near-zero policy rates, interest rates are no longer discovered in the marketplace but rather imposed from on high, creating a 'financial dream world' or 'hall of mirrors' where things are not what they seem.
“i have contended george that that because our interest rates are not discovered in the marketplace these days but rather imposed from on high uh or if not imposed heavily influenced from on high that to that extent we are living in a kind of financial dream world we are living in a hall of mirrors because things are not what they seem”
The combination of visible debt in the corporate and government sectors, yield curve flattening, and very high inflation rates (around three percent) are creating conditions for stagflation (stagnation plus inflation), which was thought impossible by some Keynesian economists but did occur in the 1970s and could happen again.
“the fear i think is that uh the combination of the visible debt in the economy the combination of that plus the visible flattening at some portions of the yield code and the intrusion of very high rates of inflation at least three things are setting up for what we used to call stagflation in the 70s speculation being of course the state of recession overlaid on inflation keynesian once said that was unlikely or impossible but it did happen way back when i guess it could happen again”
Grant does not know whether these long interest rate cycles follow a 'law' (in the sense of a law of physics) or can be explained by monetary regime changes; he views them as a mystery worthy of caution—people who claim to know what interest rates 'should' do are likely overconfident.
“you know interest rates are so funny that that respect you know they i don't think i can't think of any other uh department of finance that exhibits these long cycles but i'm not sure that they're a matter of physics i'm not sure it's hard and fast [32:43] it's a law capital l... but uh you know i leave it as a mystery but something to know has happened and to be and to be wary of those who contend now that oh yes interest rates fall that's what they do for a living yeah”
The 10-cent beer night incident at Cleveland's Municipal Stadium in 1974 perfectly illustrates how mispricing a substance (beer) leads to harmful outcomes (riots, arrests, emergency room visits), and this metaphor applies directly to the mispricing of credit and money caused by suppressed interest rates.
“so this is announced and 25 000 self-selected individuals push their way through the turnstiles this old cavernous ball yard and the game progresses and the cheering gets a little bit uh rowdy and uh before you know it fans are down the field introducing themselves to players and uh and uh the score is uh nine to nothing that's a forfeit george cleveland lost again with the tying run on third base at the bottom of the ninth wouldn't you know it so um it turns and and so you know there was a full moon but that wasn't the problem that wasn't the reason for the emergency room visits the streakers or the arrests the problem was the mispricing of a substance even more potent than credit”
Gold's value is conceptually 'the reciprocal of the world's faith in central banks'—expressed as one divided by trust—making gold a hedge against loss of confidence in monetary institutions and central bank credibility.
“i think conceptually you know present gold is the reciprocal of the world's faith and in central banks and and matters one divided by trust”
The truth about financial markets lies between the Efficient Markets Hypothesis (too hygienic, too rational) and the opposite extreme (market chaos). Markets exhibit long periods of normal behavior interrupted by speculative extremes, and monetary regimes influence where on this spectrum the market operates.
“i would say that the truth falls somewhere between the efficient markets hypothesis the soft form and my somewhat exaggerated hyperbolic riff on it but um but kathy woods i think there have been kathy woods's during the pure gold standard during the interwar fake gold standard called the gold exchange standard there were kathy woods's during the bretton woods twilight fake gold standard and there is”
Despite the apparent weakness and vulnerability of the 'PhD standard' monetary regime, it has proven remarkably durable because people believe in it, and as long as people believe in the narrative of Fed competence, they will dismiss gold as foolish and continue supporting fiat currency.
“so as as as seemingly um feeble and as as as vulnerable as the phd standard might seem to be it is in some respects as hard as steel you know people do believe it and believing it they are prepared to turn your back on gold because you're silly because they know that there are better things in the world”
Gold has no traditional valuation metrics (P/E ratio, book value, earnings yield), but recently there was a large amount of government bonds (approximately $18 trillion) yielding less than zero percent in nominal terms, making gold's zero yield competitive with negative-yielding bonds.
“there's no pe price earnings ratio there's no book value there's no earnings yield although gold does out yield only recently there were like 18 trillion dollars worth of bonds in the world price to yield less than nothing in nominal terms so gold was out yielding uh at zero without yielding that cohort of so-called fixed income securities”
A successful Wall Street career typically lasts about 25 years, meaning someone could have 1.5-2 Wall Street careers within the 41-year bond bull market (1981-present) without ever experiencing a bond bear market, which removes market participants' lived experience with rising rates.
“so that's 40 41 years and you have to be even older than i am george that's if that's conceivable wall street a successful wall street career is like 25 years if you're if you're any good at all you're playing golf in boca raton so you could have one and a half wall street careers and never have seen the bond bear market right right”
The typical yield curve shape reflects 'the impatience of the ordinary human being'—people prefer something available now over waiting, creating a preference for earlier-maturing securities that typically have lower yields than later-maturing ones.
“so what is a yield curve it's this [20:44] is simply the spectrum of interest rates over time so it stretches from zero which is like this instant to 30 years and typically bonds maturing later longer dated securities have a higher yield because of the typical human preference for something available now rather than having to wait so the impatience of the ordinary human being accounts for conventional shape of [21:16] the yield curve”
People in general are not skilled at understanding money and monetary systems, which is why there is abundant confusion about inflation, interest rates, and central banking.
“i think i've often reflected that money is not humanity's best subject but around large sums of money people just go crazy”
Grant recently had a 10-year subscriber sign up for Grants Interest Rate Observer, which he views as remarkable evidence of optimism and confidence in his publication's value, given his age (75.5 years old).
“some people are wondering okay this guy is 75 and a half years old what is he doing [Music] writing about this stuff at this [55:01] grandfatherly stage of life well i can i don't know the answer to that but i can tell you that somebody took a 10 year subscription just last week yeah 10 years how's that for how's that for optimism”
Grant's Interest Rate Observer newsletter has been published continuously every two weeks since 1983 (40 years as of 2023), offering analysis, forward-looking commentary, and editorial cartoons, with an annual subscription price of approximately $1,400.
“it started 1983 i've been doing it since then and we publish every two weeks we mean to have the um the best ideas the best pros the most imaginative forward-looking commentary analysis and the funniest cartoon on page one and sometimes we succeed that's grant's interest rate until it runs the 12 pages uh you subscribe i can't i forgot what the what some people call the very high price but i regard is an absurdly low price at 1400 years old a little less perhaps if you ask nicely”