In peer conflict scenarios involving capable opponents with anti-carrier weaponry, investing in 4-5 nuclear attack submarines might generate more military utility per dollar than investing in an additional carrier, as war games show submarine forces 'absolutely went to town sinking opposing ships' even when carriers were considered challenging threats.
causalpending
Speaker
Unidentified Speaker — The Future of the Aircraft Carrier - New Threats, Power Pro… [Wv2C6EZW3Oc]Evidence Quote
“is having an additional carrier worth not having an additional 4 or 5 nuclear attack submarines? In that same publicly released war-gaming series in which the carriers got smacked, the submarine forces absolutely went to town sinking opposing ships.”
Created: 8/10/2026, 10:22:30 PM
My Notes
Loading notes...