Calling a 1-or-2-degree rise in temperature 'dangerous' (as in Jim Hansen's 2006 paper) is not a scientific term and can only be justified by a belief in a constancy of nature that shouldn't be changed; thus the balance-of-nature idea underlies much of the global warming alarm.
causalpending
Speaker
Daniel BotkinEvidence Quote
“the only reason you could say it's dangerous is because you have a belief in a constancy of nature that shouldn't be changed and so the balance of nature is really very important as an idea underlying how reviewing global warming”
Created: 6/16/2026, 2:13:19 PM
My Notes
Loading notes...