Aronson counters the asymmetry argument by noting that the presumption that larger data volumes lead to competitive advantage is not supported by evidence—data quality, completeness, and accuracy matter more than quantity.

causalpending

Speaker

Susan Aronson

Evidence Quote

you're presuming that economies of scale and scope lead to competitiveness in data right the more dated sources you have there's no evidence of that in fact the opposite is true what matters is the quality completeness accuracy of the data set

Source

China's Grand Strategy For Global Data Dominance | Hoover InstitutionHoover Institution
Created: 8/10/2026, 11:18:09 PM

My Notes

Loading notes...