Shambaugh argues that engagement was 'not naive' and 'not a mistake' but rather 'a gamble' and 'a bet' that 'could have gone either way'; if Chinese politics had gone a different direction (presumably toward greater liberalization), the bet might have worked out better; the failure was not inevitable but contingent on Chinese choices
normativepending
Speaker
Larry DiamondEvidence Quote
“It was worth a try, right? It's just it was a bet. It was a gamble. It could have gone either way.”
Source
Breaking The Engagement: How China Won And Lost America | Hoover Institution— Hoover InstitutionCreated: 8/11/2026, 6:24:14 AM
My Notes
Loading notes...