Shambaugh argues that engagement was 'not naive' and 'not a mistake' but rather 'a gamble' and 'a bet' that 'could have gone either way'; if Chinese politics had gone a different direction (presumably toward greater liberalization), the bet might have worked out better; the failure was not inevitable but contingent on Chinese choices

normativepending

Speaker

Larry Diamond

Evidence Quote

It was worth a try, right? It's just it was a bet. It was a gamble. It could have gone either way.

Source

Breaking The Engagement: How China Won And Lost America | Hoover InstitutionHoover Institution
Created: 8/11/2026, 6:24:14 AM

My Notes

Loading notes...