Justin Carboni
About
Financial planner and co-host of Two Quants and a Financial Planner; focuses on client behavioral aspects of financial planning
Cast within
No topic-region cast yet — this appears once Justin Carboni's compiled claims are aligned into a topic region's argument tree.
Claims by Justin Carboni (11)
Justin Carboni's job in financial planning is 90% asking 'are we on track with what we're trying to do?' and drilling down on the why—when clients feel tempted to chase performance or de-risk, the key intervention is asking 'how would you have felt if the market was down 20% and you were down 22%?' to test whether the proposed action actually aligns with their risk tolerance.
Diversification across asset classes (stocks, bonds, international, etc.) is like diversifying your diet—going to an Italian restaurant one night, Thai the next, Chinese the third, and an American burger on the weekend yields better results and complements different needs than going all-in on one cuisine.
The Seinfeld karate episode demonstrates a benchmarking lesson: Kramer took children's karate classes as an adult, advanced quickly, and felt successful until learning he was competing against children—the lesson is to pick your benchmarks and competition carefully, and understand that you can succeed at one benchmark (adult competing against children) while failing at another (adult competing against other adults).
Richard Feynman's story of safe-cracking illustrates effort performance: he learned that many executives never changed their safes from the factory default combination (1-2-3-4), so he could crack them in 45 seconds, but he would pretend to work for several minutes to maintain the appearance of effort and not disappoint the people who made bets on his ability—showing that sometimes you have to perform effort even when the actual work is done.
'De-risking' is a version of not looking like somebody is taking high risk—it's conceptually similar to Buffett being 'poor' relative to Bezos: you don't have to chase every high-performing asset if you can accept that you're giving up some relative returns, and you should skate to where the puck is going (not where it already is) rather than chasing what has already worked.
My Notes
Loading notes...