Steven Codkin
About
Princeton University historian, expert on modern authoritarianism and Soviet history; author of Stalin biography
Cast within
No topic-region cast yet — this appears once Steven Codkin's compiled claims are aligned into a topic region's argument tree.
Claims by Steven Codkin (20 of 66)
The US faces faithful choices: preserve American primacy, let it go, keep current alliances or restructure them, accommodate China/Russia/Iran by granting spheres of influence, or try to contain them and rebuild a 350-ship fleet; the question is whether to find new equilibrium in each region or face confrontation, and whether the US can combine containment, cooperation, delicate calibration of strength and diplomacy.
The G7 at its peak accounted for just under 70% of global GDP, but now accounts for only 47% of global GDP, meaning the G7 countries have only gotten richer in absolute terms but their share of global GDP is dropping like a stone—this is called success but the West was not ready for it.
The Western sphere of influence during the Cold War was a classic sphere of influence inspired and sustained by competition with the Soviet Union, and it played a significant part in European integration, gave impetus to American civil rights and desegregation, and disciplined American power to remain part of something larger than itself.
China has 20 borders (14 on land and 6 on sea) and multiple border disputes with neighbors, and despite rapid military modernization, is geographically hemmed in by US military bases and Taiwan, while the US has vastly superior geography (Canada, Mexico, oceans) and unmatched global military reach.
Russia has three current spheres of influence (Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Crimea, and Eastern Ukraine), but Russia's actual sphere of influence in the post-Soviet space doesn't really exist because those countries are suspicious of Russia and recognize it could annex them.
Russian hacking is different from Chinese hacking: Chinese hacking does a million attacks all at once hoping one gets in, while Russian hacking does pinpoint attacks to exactly where they want, gets in, and doesn't turn the malware on—they just stay in case they need it later, for example staying in JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs to potentially shut Wall Street down.
Enduring shifts in the global balance of power are extremely rare, but when they happen they are momentous; large-scale wars are always predicted after the fact on cable television and are only obvious post-facto; business as usual can trigger large-scale conflict; all wars are miscalculation by decision makers; and the US and China are now in a situation of potential confrontation due to Chinese opacity, American ignorance and incompetence.
My Notes
Loading notes...