
What this covers
Interview recorded - 21st of July, 2026
On this episode of the WTFinance podcast I had the pleasure of welcoming back Mike Green. Mike Green is Chief Strategist and Portfolio Manager at Simplify Asset Management, and one of the most influential voices on market structure in finance today.
During our conversation we spoke about the current situation in markets, the ever increasing leverage through ETF's, what this means for market structure, geopolitical impact and more. I hope you enjoy!
0:00 - Introduction 1:14 - Overview of the economy and markets? 9:02 - Leverage in market 12:26 - Hyperscalers fundraising 16:42 - Systemic credit risks? 19:04 - Markets driving economy? 21:46 - Strong economy 24:56 - Geopolitical impact 28:23 - China and BRICS 29:55 - Plaza accord 2.0? 35:00 - US rising vs China? 38:52 - FED/treasury backstopping 40:26 - Financial nihilism 41:42 - One message to takeaway
Michael has been a student of markets and market structure, for nearly 30 years. His proprietary research into the shift from actively managed portfolios and investment funds to systematic passive investment strategies has been presented to the Federal Reserve, the BIS, the IMF and numerous other industry groups and associations.
Michael joined Simplify in April 2021 after serving as Chief Strategist and Portfolio Manager for Logica Capital Advisers, LLC. Prior to Logica, Michael managed macro strategies at Thiel Macro, LLC, an investment firm that manages the personal capital of Peter Thiel. Prior to Thiel, Michael founded Ice Farm Capital, a discretionary global macro hedge fund seeded by Soros Fund Management. From 2006-2014, Michael founded and managed the New York office of Canyon Capital Advisors, a $23B multi-strategy hedge fund based in Los Angeles, CA, where he established their global macro strategies, managing in excess of $5B of exposure across equity, credit, FX, commodity and derivative markets.
In addition to his work as a market theorist and portfolio manager, Michael has been noted for his work as a public speaker and financial media participant. He is a graduate of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and a CFA holder.
Michael Green -
Substack - https://www.yesigiveafig.com/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/profplum99 LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-green-9a15142/ Simplify - https://www.simplify.us/
WTFinance -
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/wtfinancee/ Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/67rpmjG92PNBW0doLyPvfn iTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/wtfinance/id1554934665?uo=4 Twitter - https://twitter.com/AnthonyFatseas
Source description (no synthesized summary yet).
Mike Green argues that mechanistic investing flows through leveraged ETFs and passive index funds—not fundamental valuations—are driving unprecedented asset price inflation and systemic financial risk at a scale exceeding the 2008 housing crisis, with profound implications for market stability, capital allocation, and geopolitical competition.
- Leveraged ETF flows create endogenous liquidity and volatility drag that inflates prices independent of fundamentals; 2x leverage in daily rebalancing produces 4x volatility harvesting gains/losses, incentivizing dollar-cost averaging into losses
- The scale of passive/leveraged vehicle AUM ($500B+ in levered ETF complex) now exceeds housing crisis exposure; stock market participation rates are extraordinarily high and equity wealth dominance over real estate signals structural fragility
- Overvalued equities create agency problems where management teams pursue capital-destructive spending to justify valuations, while the mechanical bid from passive flows has eliminated short-seller discipline and reformed market's price-discovery function
This asset isn't compiled yet
You're seeing its claims, ranked. Compile it to build the argument threads, weight them, and check each claim against your library — the full view.
The leveraged ETF complex includes various strategies beyond simple 2x long; covered call overlaying (selling call options on long stock positions) is actually a form of corporate credit underwriting where individuals receive income from call premiums but maintain 100% downside exposure, equivalent to being short credit risk without credit underwriting skills.
“covered call over writing, etc. Those strategies themselves are actually methods of underwriting debt. Um, if you think about what happens to the covered call, you have very little upside. You receive the vast majority of your return in the form of the call premium that is being received. But you're exposed to 100% of the downside cuz you continue to hold the underlying security. Um, if you do the payoff structure on that, that's just a form of corporate credit.”
Leveraged ETF flows create endogenous liquidity through daily rebalancing; a stock that rises 10% then falls 10% creates a mathematical loss of 1% (volatility drag) in the underlying, but in a 2x leveraged version this loss is magnified to approximately 4% because the leverage compounds the effect (1.2 × 0.8 = 0.96 vs 1.1 × 0.9 = 0.99).
“imagine you have a stock that is up 10% and down 10% the next day. Many academics will study that and 'Well, we need to average those two and therefore there's zero gain associated with that stock.' But in reality, because returns are linked, so the first day it goes from 1 to 1.1, the next day it is multiplied by 0.9, that means you're left with 0.99. There's actually been a loss of 1%. That's what's referred to as volatility drag. And the strategy to capture that is called volatility harvesting. If you introduce that in a 2x levered version, it's not twice as much gain, it's actually four times as much gain, because now you have 1.2 * 0.8, which gives you 0.96.”
The returns required in securities being purchased through dollar-cost averaging into leveraged ETFs with realized volatility exceeding 100% are impossibly high (well above 100% annual gains for Micron example), meaning the math guarantees losses for retail investors pursuing this strategy despite temporary rallies.
“In the case of a company like Micron, for example, which is currently printing a realized vol in excess of a hundred, the returns that need to be generated are well above a hundred plus percent on an annual basis in Micron's stock for people to break even that are dollar cost averaging into this. It's possible, right? I mean we could get bailed out by this, but I think it is unlikely”
Special purpose vehicles (SPVs) have shifted credit risk away from high-quality suppliers onto their customers through off-take agreements; the suppliers are not liable for the borrowing unless the customer cannot pay, in which case the debt can flow back onto the supplier's balance sheet.
“the most nefarious component of it were called the special purpose vehicles, uh which effectively have, you know, the underwriting coming from the high quality high quality supplier. Um and they are not liable for it because their customers have actually done the borrowing. Unless, of course, the customer can't pay. And then that debt can flow onto the balance sheet.”
The Great Depression was so severe in the US because the US had become the manufacturer to the world; when the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were enacted, the rest of the world rejected US products, creating excess production capacity that was rapidly dematerialized.
“I I think there are a lot of similarities. It's important to recognize that the Great Depression was so great in the United States because the US had become that manufacturer to the world. And in the environment of the smooth Holly tariffs, you use all the rest of the world basically look at the US and say no, we don't want your products anymore. We're going to erect barriers against it. That's really what that process was all about. That meant that the excess production capacity in the United States no longer found a home and required a rapid dematerialization of our production capacity, which is what we locally think of as the Great Depression.”
China passed the United States in manufacturing capacity some time ago (not in 1920 as commonly thought but in 1870 for the US/UK transition), and unlike the US in 1870-1920, China lacks rapid population growth to provide a ready workforce; the question is whether automation can overcome the constraint of a declining labor force.
“I think it is different, and I think it's important to recognize that it didn't occur in 1920, that occurred in 1870. Um, you know, so there is a very long lead time for these components. China passed the United States in terms of manufacturing capacity quite a bit of, quite a bit ago as well. Um, and unlike the United States in the period of 1870 to 1920, it does not, it does not have rapid population growth that provides a ready and willing, uh, workforce that is, um, you know, able to rapidly scale itself upwards. The question at this point is, what is the role of automation and the potential for China to increase productivity further on their declining labor force.”
The majority of recent market impact is driven by mechanical flows from passive investment vehicles and leveraged ETFs rather than fundamental valuation changes; when a buy order is sent to a 2x levered ETF, it mechanically buys two times the Nvidia shares regardless of any assessment of whether that purchase makes economic sense.
“I operate off of a model that suggests that the majority of the impact that we're seeing in markets is largely a mechanical function of the way that we've chosen to invest. Whether that is passively or through leveraged ETFs, which are actually the subject of a lot of the research I'm doing right now. Uh there's very little thought that is being applied to the market. And I don't mean that in the context of people are doing stupid things. I literally mean it in the sense of if you send a buy order in for the 2x levered Nvidia fund, it is going to buy two times as much Nvidia as you actually sent dollars. There's not going to be a debate within the fund about whether or not you should be buying this, you should not be buying this, etc. It's simply responding to the mechanical flows.”
The share of US household wealth held in equities has risen well above real estate and exceeded all other forms including private business equity by a wide margin, with extraordinary participation rates in the US stock market creating structural vulnerability similar to the housing crisis but at meaningfully larger scale.
“The scale of this has now you know, meaningfully exceeded the scale of the housing cra- crash. The um, share of US wealth, household wealth that's held in equities has risen well above real estate. It's actually exceeded all other forms, including private business equity by a wide margin. Participation rates in US households in the US stock market are extraordinarily high.”
In South Korea, 3% of the population has received a margin call in recent weeks due to leveraged ETF losses; scaled to the United States, this would be equivalent to approximately 10 million people experiencing sudden market losses from leverage they did not fully understand.
“3% of the Korean population apparently has received a margin call in the last couple of weeks. To scale that to the United States, that would be roughly the equivalent of 10 million people um experiencing a sudden loss in the market um tied to a leveraging feature that most people don't understand.”
Nihilism emerges when people discover that experts have no idea what they're talking about; the analogy is that church attendance collapses when villagers discover the village priest is sleeping with the nuns—once authority is exposed as corrupt or incompetent, cultural norms and behaviors deteriorate.
“We are broadly seeing the sort of nihilism that emerges once people realize that the experts have no idea what they're talking about, right? Um nothing good falls apart faster than a village in which it's discovered that the village priest is sleeping with all the nuns. Um you know, church attendance falls very rapidly, um cultural norms and behaviors uh begin to deteriorate as people say, 'Well, if the man of God is willing to do this, why can't I do it?'”
China is externalizing its domestic overproduction problems through exports, primarily in manufacturing including energy complex finished products; the rest of the world doesn't want to accept this because of implications for their domestic production, as visible in Europe's auto sector.
“It's largely trying to externalize that through export export capacity primarily in manufacturing including the manufacturing of finished products in in the energy complex. Um the rest of the world doesn't really want to accept that because of the implications it has for their domestic production. Look at what's happening to Europe with autos for example.”
The 2x leveraged ETF complex has destabilized the institutional volatility harvesting system that was historically predictable and profitable for paired long/short positions; retail adoption as long-term investment substitutes for expensive margin debt has broken the historical hedging relationship.
“The 2x levered ETF complex is a phenomenal source of profits for what's called volatility harvesting in which you pair a long and a short position in the 2x levered long and the 2x levered short. It's part of the reason why these are always introduced in pairs. Um and you can create a performance uh uh calendar that really just looks like volatili- what's called volatility harvesting. And just to link the math directly behind that, imagine you have a stock that is up 10% and down 10% the next day.”
The theory that all information is represented in markets is "totally wrong," but it is a useful model that has been blindly adopted; society is going through the motions of religious behaviors (passive investing) without understanding why or what the stock market is supposed to represent (marginal cost of capital influencing investment decisions).
“we blindly adopted a theory that all information is represented in markets, which we know to be totally wrong. Um but you know, it is a useful model. Um you know, what I I just think unfortunately we are more and more like a society that is going through the motions of religious um uh behaviors or or um activities rather than understanding why we're engaged in those activities. Why are we saving in the stock market? What does it actually do? What is the stock market supposed to represent? It's supposed to represent the marginal cost of capital to influence the investment decisions of companies.”
A 2x leveraged long and short pair can harvest volatility in a calendar that looks like pure volatility harvesting, creating performance returns from rebalancing gains rather than directional appreciation
“The 2x levered ETF complex is a phenomenal source of profits for what's called volatility harvesting in which you pair a long and a short position in the 2x levered long and the 2x levered short. It's part of the reason why these are always introduced in pairs. And you can create a performance uh uh calendar that really just looks like volatili- what's called volatility harvesting.”
The crack spread (difference between gasoline and crude prices) is rising rapidly due to refining capacity constraints, indicating supply pressure in refined products rather than crude.
“what's called the crack spread, the spread between gasoline prices and oil prices, is rising rapidly.”
South Korea has historically shut its market only 8 times in history (including the Asian financial crisis), but has now shut its market 6 times in a single year, and has banned 2x leveraged and leveraged ETFs expressing regret that they ever approved them, indicating regulators do not understand the products they are introducing.
“Korea has actually only shut its market eight times in history including the Asian financial crisis. It is now shut its sixth time this year. Um they have banned 2x levered and levered ETFs. They have expressed regret that they ever approved them. That suggests as I think is the case that the regulators don't understand the products that they're actually introducing and how those are being marketed to retail.”
GDP growth has declined in both real and unit terms consistently; full-time jobs have not grown for nearly 4 years, indicating the economy is weakening even as market-focused administrations claim nothing has ever been better.
“GDP growth has declined in um both real and unit terms um or GDP growth has declined in both real and unit terms consistently. Full-time jobs have not grown now for nearly 4 years. Um this is creating conditions under which the economy is weakening but a an administration that is very focused on the stock market is convinced that nothing has ever been better.”
We are a social species that flourishes when we are excellent to each other, and should approach the current context by being excellent to one another despite emphasis on 'party on.'
“we are a social species, we do exist in harmony with our neighbor, um and we all flourish in which we are excellent to each other, and I would encourage people to be excellent to each other even as the emphasis seems to be on party on, dudes.”
President Trump ran on a campaign that he was the only president who hadn't started a war in recent years, but has now started multiple wars including extraordinarily short-lived ones like Venezuela, and protracted ones like the Iran conflict, creating loss of perceived US capability and emboldening countries like China.
“Yeah, I mean it's remarkable. This is a president who ran under the campaign that he was the only president who hadn't started a war in the past, you know, X number of years and now we've seen him start multiple wars, some of which were extraordinarily short-lived like Venezuela, others are proving into proving to be more protracted and more negative candidly for the, you know, observation that the US has functioned as the global policeman.”
AI/internet search will ultimately become advertiser-supported and available to all individuals unless the US chooses to embrace national security narratives that protect proprietary frontier models under a too-big-to-fail framework.
“That will ultimately discover much like internet search it simply becomes advertiser supported and it's available to all individuals unless of course we choose to embrace the national security narrative that this needs to be protected in some manner and the unique champions that are pursuing their proprietary frontier models are, you know, too big to fail before they even get public. Um that's certainly a possibility with this administration.”
China's sanctions-driven semiconductor capacity expansion will likely dominate the market and bring down prices, following the historical pattern that whenever China has put its sights on a market (solar, steel, aluminum), it has come to dominate that market in a low-cost framework, suggesting the semiconductor commodity cycle may be much worse than currently anticipated.
“I would highlight that the sanctions against China have created conditions under which China is aggressively ramping up its semiconductor production and producing in many of the areas attempting certainly to produce in areas it has historically been unable to do. Um anytime China has put its sights on a market whether it's solar or steel or aluminum, etc. it has come to dominate that in the low cost framework that suggests to me actually the commodity cycle may be much worse in terms of memory, etc. and chips than people are currently thinking about. That's my hypothesis. I can't be correct. I can't articulate that I'm correct on that”
The narrative around AI being the solution has emerged because elevated stock prices are creating a story that becomes self-reinforcing through reflexivity; management and policy behaviors adapt to support the narrative rather than to fundamental economic reality.
“and it's creating a story that people are buying into that, you know, everything is fantastic and AI is the solution. And the work that I'm doing right now actually suggests roughly 2/3 of this move is just tied to this mechanical component. So sure, Micron should have appreciated on the increase in earnings but the multiple should have contracted significantly and significantly more than it has um on a fundamental basis. So I would highlight that the sanctions against China have created conditions under which China is aggressively ramping up its semiconductor production and producing in many of the areas attempting certainly to produce in areas it has historically been unable to do. Um anytime China has put its sights on a market whether it's solar or steel or aluminum, etc. it has come to dominate that in the low cost framework that suggests to me actually the commodity cycle may be much worse in terms of memory, etc. and chips than people are currently thinking about. That's my hypothesis. I can't be correct. I can't articulate that I'm correct on that, but I am correct on the math at this point that it is the mechanical components that are driving these prices to extraordinary levels and creating the volatility that we're experiencing. And unfortunately that suggests that much of this money is going to evaporate into that into that lost volatility and continuous releveraging framework. Um I think it's an unfortunate tragedy that is is playing out before our eyes even as people think that they're getting much wealthier.”
The US had an opportunity to address China's mercantilist overproduction through collaborative economic frameworks similar to those used against Japan in the 1980s (forcing Japan to internalize its excess demand), but has squandered diplomatic capability through political assertions of dominance rather than economic competitiveness.
“There was an extraordinary opportunity that that could have been pursued under economic frameworks not dissimilar to what was pursued against Japan in the 1980s as the European complex had to absorb um the imports that were increasingly rejected from the United States. Eventually the world came together to to uh negotiate with Japan and force them to internalize their lack of demand which resulted in a two-decade-long stretch um of, you know, lost economy. Um China faces something very, very similar if the rest of the world decides to um uh unify against this type of abuse. But we as I as I highlighted, I think unfortunately we appear to have squandered some of that capability”
The implications of emerging nihilism are adverse for future outcomes; the speaker encourages people to "be excellent to each other" as a social principle, invoking Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure.
“Um I think that type of behavior we are seeing increasingly across our society and the implications for it, unfortunately, are adverse for our future outcomes. You know, I I I finished a another discussion earlier today with a reference to Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure and I I would just remind people that at the end of the day we are a social species, we do exist in harmony with our neighbor, um and we all flourish in which we are excellent to each other, and I would encourage people to be excellent to each other even as the emphasis seems to be on party on, dudes.”
Companies like SpaceX borrowed capital immediately upon becoming public, but that borrowing is underwritten against multi-trillion dollar equity valuations rather than actual negative cash flows that would never justify lending in normal circumstances; if share prices collapse, that leverage will evaporate alongside it.
“Many of these companies, I would highlight SpaceX's very first action after getting public was to go out and borrow capital. That cap that borrowing is, um, underwritten not against the cash flow of SpaceX, which is fantastically negative and nobody in their right mind would lend that money to SpaceX in the absence of a multi-trillion dollar valuation.”
S&P 500 profits are likely to become far more cyclical and sensitive to the technology sector because the representation of hardware within the index has been dramatically increased, contrary to the narrative of a diversified index.
“It ultimately means that the profits of the S&P 500 are likely to become far more cyclical and far more sensitive to the technology sector. Um, primarily because we've dramatically increased the representation of hardware within the index. I understand that that is contrary to the narrative that most people are experiencing, but it is what the math suggests.”
In environments of overvalued equities, there is no capacity for activist investors or short-sellers to discipline management because the mechanical bid from passive flows has wiped out short-seller community capacity and overvalued securities cannot be effectively attacked through shorting.
“There's nothing that can really be done against an overvalued security other than attempting to short it and in the environment that I was describing where the mechanical process and inflation of these bids that's occurring through the passive complex has wiped out the short-seller community there's really no capacity for any form of reform”
Real interest rates are extraordinarily high and compensating those with significant cash holdings for doing nothing but putting money in bank accounts earning interest; this income supports financial speculation from upper income deciles and would be replaced if rates were cut, which would prove contractionary.
“an extraordinarily high real interest rate that is actually compensating those who have significant quantities of cash for really doing nothing with that cash um other than putting it into bank accounts that are now earning relatively significant income for them. That in turn is being used to fund the financial speculation. Perversely, if we were to cut interest rates, I think the reality is is that it would ultimately prove contractionary as that income is replaced and spending from the upper uh decile in terms of capacity um because of the interest income falling with a cut in interest rates would likely begin to retreat adding additional weakness to the economy.”
Capex spending by hyperscalers in AI/semiconductors is more productive than if they hoarded billions through buybacks, but it may still represent a prosocial bubble where overinvestment becomes available as distressed assets when cost structures collapse and are repurposed.
“it's important to distinguish between what's called a a prosocial bubble in which investment is creating opportunities for those assets to return to the market under distress conditions under which their cost structure is radically lowered. And I I ultimately think that we will see that in the AI space.”
China is becoming the primary beneficiary of refined product (gasoline, naphtha, kerosene) refining capacity through "gasoline diplomacy" as refining capacity in Russia, Ukraine, and the Middle East is targeted or degraded in conflicts.
“it puts the world more dependent on Chinese refining capacity, which itself, of course, if hostile action were to increase, um would potentially become at risk in in future conflict. Um if that does not emerge, I think unfortunately the United States runs the risk of finding that China through its gasoline diplomacy is ultimately um better positioned than they were going into this conflict.”
The Strait of Hormuz has become increasingly irrelevant as alternative oil sourcing solutions emerge through capitalism's incentives; the real problem is refined product capacity which has specific geographic constraints and cannot be easily replaced.
“the quantity of oil that will need to transit the Strait of Hormuz as alternative solutions are sought and obtained, which is what capitalism does. Um will ultimately uh mean that the Strait of Hormuz is diminished greatly in terms of importance as this oil more broadly. The bigger issue, candidly, is in the refined product space”
With mechanical market inflation and eliminated shorting capacity, everyone is betting that this time is different, but the speaker can mathematically demonstrate why it's not different; like a teacher saying 2+2=4, the mathematical proof doesn't stop people from disagreeing.
“there's less and less capacity you know, or or fiduciary flexibility to pursue the type of protection that many people would would otherwise seek in these frameworks. But, you know, the math is very straightforward. You have a mechanical inflation of the market shorting is a disaster. And so, everyone is now in one form or another betting that this time is different. And I I don't think that's the case. I think I can mathematically demonstrate why it's not different. Um but you know, the teacher telling you 2 + 2 = 4 doesn't stop the kid in the back of the class shouting, 'No, it's five.'”
Bitcoin miners have recognized that their primary asset is not mining hash rate but the power purchasing agreements and off-take agreements they entered into, which they can now repurpose as sales to data centers; capacity and hash rate in Bitcoin are falling, lowering aggregate network security.
“the Bitcoin miners themselves have recognized that their primary asset is not the mining of Bitcoin, but the the power purchasing agreements that they entered into when energy prices were low. And the off-take agreements they have associated with that, which they can now repurpose into sales to data centers. Um, and you know, as that occurs, the um, capacity and hash rate in the Bitcoin universe is actually falling, uh, lowering the aggregate security of the asset itself.”
The leveraged ETF complex has grown to approximately $200 billion in assets under management, and when multiplied by 2-2.5x leverage across products, represents roughly half a trillion dollars in capital that is likely to evaporate due to volatility drag, constituting a real economic loss
“at one point the levered ETF complex had grown to about 200 million 200 billion dollars in AUM. Um, multiply that by approximately two to two and a half, um, given the relative leverage leverage across the products, and you're suggesting suddenly somewhere in the neighborhood of half a trillion dollars in capital that has flowed into this space that ultimately is likely to evaporate over time due to this volatility drag feature.”
Data center construction debt in the semiconductor space is being added to investment-grade credit pools that can least afford credit risk, and is underwritten against posted equity values rather than actual cash flows which have deteriorated or are negative
“An incredible amount of leverage is being added into the investment grade community. That debt that can least afford any form of credit risk. Uh and it's largely being underwritten against the equity values that we're seeing posted on the screen rather than the cash flows themselves, which is I noted have deteriorated in many cases are quite negative.”
Option hedging dynamics similar to those that powered meme stock movements in GameStop and AMC are now playing out at a much larger scale in mega-cap stocks, where options hedging forces buying that artificially inflates stock prices
“it is similar to the behavior of meme stocks in which option positions created conditions under which forced buying from those hedging their underlying market exposures um in an attempt to preserve a neutral directional component powered moves significantly higher in stocks like GameStop or AMC. Uh that same phenomenon is now unfortunately playing out at a much larger scale in some of the largest companies in the index um and is powering a lot of the behavior that we're seeing.”
Bitcoin holding companies like MicroStrategy are now willing to sell Bitcoin if needed to cover debt obligations; this reflects the reality that leveraged equity positions in Bitcoin-holding vehicles create debt that must be repaid through whatever means available.
“On top of all the other shenanigans that we were talking about in terms of levered Bitcoin holding vehicles like a MicroStrategy, which of course is, you know, now turned into a hey, we will sell Bitcoin after all if we need the cash. This is unfortunately the reality of credit. If you have to repay debt, you have to get those dollars.”
If there is a downturn in stock markets, it will flow through to consumer sentiment and the broader economy; the bigger issue is the impact on corporate decision-making as management teams attempt to justify the elevated valuations they see rewarded in the market.
“Yeah, I think there's an element of that. We certainly saw sentiment take a downturn associated with that. I think the bigger issue is the impact it has on the decision-making process of companies themselves who are trying to justify the valuations with the expenditures that they see rewarded in the market.”
Tesla's inclusion in the S&P 500 caused fantastic appreciation that has largely gone sideways to down since, but the company has maintained a very high valuation despite deteriorated fundamentals; this will replay in the current AI/semiconductor bubble where mechanical flows inflate prices that will not be sustained when flows reverse.
“I liken it to Tesla being included in the S&P 500 which caused a fantastic appreciation of Tesla which has largely gone sideways to down in the period since, um, but unfortunately it has maintained itself at a very, very high valuation even as the fundamentals have deteriorated. Um, I think this is going to play out in a very similar fashion.”
In current markets with mechanical inflation and declining shorting capacity, trying to deviate from the benchmark benchmark results in losses while the market inflates around you; most investors respond by playing close to home and minimizing deviation, accepting that losses are explained by overall market losses.
“Well, I think most people's reaction myself included to this, you basically try to you know, play as close to home as possible and minimize your deviation from the benchmark because the answer is always well, I lost money because the market lost money. Um you know, in long only configurations and with with short dedicated long short funds rapidly moving towards net long positioning in aggregate, there's less and less capacity you know, or or fiduciary flexibility to pursue the type of protection that many people would would otherwise seek”
Current credit underwriting against equity values in data centers and semiconductors closely mirrors 2006 housing market credit underwriting that was based on home prices rather than borrower capacity to pay, suggesting history is repeating at scale
“we've created a a replay in many ways of what happened in the housing market in 2006 in which credit underwriting was effectively written against the home prices, not necessarily the capacity of the underlying borrower to pay back the loan. Um this this looks very similar, unfortunately.”
The loss of US perceived capability from military interventions embodies the police metaphor: when citizens see the police respond ineffectively to home invasion, it raises probability of future home invasions and increases antisocial behavior more broadly.
“the cost of the loss of face and the loss of perceived capability is certainly emboldening countries like China to more aggressively pursue their own strategies and um you know, unfortunately raises the conflict that it raises the risk or probability that a wider conflict ultimately develops. If if you see the police respond to a home invasion ineffectively, it raises the probability that there will be future home invasions in the area. It also raises the probability of a broader increase in antisocial behavior.”
Private credit lending has increasingly shut out of the market and is seeing accelerating defaults and delinquencies; new lending is shifting toward leveraged financial ETFs as an alternative source of borrower demand.
“private credit, which is increasingly shut out of the market. Um, and as they are shut out, we are seeing defaults and delinquencies continue to accelerate in that space. Um, but the new form of lending is, 'Hey, let's lend to financial leveraged financial ETFs.'”
There is a cyclical industrial recovery emerging after 3.5 years of recession in the industrial sector, partly tied to reduced capacity and consolidation allowing price increases; however, broader industrial base (auto sales, housing) continues to deteriorate significantly.
“after nearly 4 years or 3 and 1/2 years of recession in the uh industrial sector of our economy, we've now started to have a cyclical recovery associated with that. Part of it is tied to the simple reality that very few things go down forever and we are beginning to see an impact on pricing as um capacity has been reduced in many areas of the economy. But the broader industrial base continues to deteriorate. If we look at auto sales, housing sales, etc. Um those all suggest that the weakness is quite profound and quite real”
Policymakers appear unwilling to examine their priors despite evidence that current strategies are raising conflict probability and encouraging aggressive competitor behavior
“policy makers seem unwilling to examine their priors.”
Situation with geopolitical tensions created by US military actions is now very difficult to reverse, with conflicts becoming more protracted and complex
“I think it's very difficult to put this back in the box.”