Claims

The fundamental incoherence of postmodernism is that it denies the existence of universal moral values and metanarratives while simultaneously asserting that tolerance is universally better than intolerance, thus making an unwarranted universal claim.

Computational irreducibility is not merely a limitation of science but something humans live with constantly in nature; we have found viable paths for existing in the natural world despite the irreducible computations constantly occurring around us.

We recognize objects by their purpose: I recognize a cup as a cup because of its purpose to me as a human being, and this recognition of purpose scales hierarchically through science—the science that gets attention and funding is always the science most useful to humans, not the science most objective.

Russell initially accepted intentionality—the view that consciousness is a mental act that intends or points to an object—as a reason for being a realist; however, he later came to reject both intentionality and knowledge of causal connections, leading him to become a phenomenalist.

Russell's theory distinguishes between knowledge by acquaintance (direct knowledge of sense data and one's own mental states) and knowledge by description (knowledge of complex entities like the present King of France described via molecular propositions), with the latter being mental constructs based on the former.

Russell's Human Knowledge (1947-48) attempted to organize scientific knowledge through deduction but discovered that direct empirical verification of generalizations provides insufficient premises for complete deductive explanation of scientific knowledge, forcing him to introduce additional non-empirical premises he called scientific postulates.

The mind is not a library (information repository) but a laboratory (testing ground for action); the point of knowledge is not to accumulate it but to test it against reality to see what actually allows you to influence the world.

Doomberg's analytical approach aims to be objective analysts rather than advocates, examining market dynamics without predetermined bullish or bearish biases, and showing reasoning transparently while remaining willing to pivot based on new evidence or market reality changes.