Unidentified Speaker — Barthes, Semiotics and the Revolt Against Structuralism [_RLhq0jsnbM]
Extraction couldn't determine who this speaker is in Barthes, Semiotics and the Revolt Against Structuralism. If you recognize them, use "Identify this speaker" above to merge their claims onto the real person.
About
Speaker whose identity could not be determined from "Barthes, Semiotics and the Revolt Against Structuralism".
Cast within
No topic-region cast yet — this appears once Unidentified Speaker — Barthes, Semiotics and the Revolt Against Structuralism [_RLhq0jsnbM]'s compiled claims are aligned into a topic region's argument tree.
Claims by Unidentified Speaker — Barthes, Semiotics and the Revolt Against Structuralism [_RLhq0jsnbM] (20 of 43)
Barthes withdraws into interiority and cultivates a carefully thorough self, and is the great philosophical exponent of pleasure and the pleasure principle in contemporary thought, moving away from the external world while trying to render it dubious, contingent, arbitrary, and dependent upon construction by the self
Barthes' reading of Nietzsche emphasizes aesthetics, a critical stance, and the outsider status of the critic, which transforms the critic into a creative artist and creates a new approach to human creativity that allows for questioning all previously established foundational discourses
Barthes' initial project of demythologizing mass culture artifacts was designed to liberate readers from the tyranny of mass-produced consciousness by decoding hidden messages in cultural artifacts to discover who is generating them and for what purposes, usually coercive purposes rooted in Marxist tradition
Barthes argues that the external world is not given to us but actively constructed by us, which is a more radical derivation from Kant's project of showing we actively construct the external world, because Barthes extends this to argue that we construct not just the world of signs and society and history, but ultimately nature itself is a social and linguistic construct
Semiotics is defined as the science of signs or the theory of signs, a general science of science, and is a subset of structural linguistics founded by de Saussure around the turn of the century, viewing the human domain as the domain of symbols and signs and trying to read these signs and look for their internal coherence
A sailor can read the clothing worn by women as a semiotic text: a nun's long black dress and crucifix signals one meaning ('hello sailor' means greeting), while a woman in red satin hot pants and see-through blouse signals prostitute and 'hi sailor' means sexual proposition, demonstrating that people are constantly doing semiotic analysis through reading the first-order meaning of signs
Barthes wrote a book called 'The System of Fashion' in which he analyzes ladies fashion and treats it as a semiotic system, analyzing the system of signs in fashion as a remarkable idea that can be applied to the entire human domain to break down every kind of communicative activity and sign
Barthes attended a world congress of detergents in 1954 in Paris and analyzed detergent advertisements as texts, finding that chemically identical products are differentiated through constructed myths: green vs. blue detergent, masculine (lumberjack) vs. feminine (housewife) imagery, creating contemporary myths where chemically equivalent products are made into different commodities through mythology
Contemporary mythology is created by modern advertisers and manufacturers rather than Homer and Shakespeare, and people worship commodities like the new Cadillac because it represents myths of good life, ease, and luxury—the myth 'cadillac style' means 'good life,' and possessing a Cadillac has become an icon of contemporary life
Barthes analyzes striptease and infers that it desexualizes woman because the process never goes the entire way into actual sex; it is an elaborate stereotype ritual that provides catharsis for men's sex drives, constructing the myth of woman as incomplete sexuality through the ritual form
Barthes analyzes the brain of Einstein as a cultural icon embodying the myth that knowledge is a formula or container—Einstein's brain in a jar means knowledge is enclosed within space and physical matter, the opposite of a postmodern icon which would destroy the brain and break the box
Barthes analyzes a French magazine photograph from the mid-1950s of a Black soldier saluting the French tri-color, arguing that the first level of meaning is simply what is depicted (a photo of a soldier saluting), but the second level of myth is an apology for French colonialism—it presents the image of a happy, content, loyal, docile Black soldier to reassure that there is no problem with colonialism despite its breakdown and the movement against it
Using Rambo movies as an example, the first level of meaning is simply sylvester Stallone killing people and being invincible, but the second-order mythological meaning is an apology for American defeat in Vietnam—the myth of American invincibility constructed to deny historical loss through the fantasy of one American defeating 500 enemies
Barthes undergoes the 'death of the author'—the author is abolished so that the critic has completely free play within the domain of the text; if the author objects that the critic's reading is not what was intended, the post-structuralist critic responds that the text is completely free and authorial intent has no authority over meaning
My Notes
Loading notes...